% vim: set sts=4 et :
\documentclass[reprint,preprintnumbers,prd,nofootinbib]{revtex4-1}

\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{array}
\usepackage{braket}
\usepackage{epstopdf}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{hepparticles}
\usepackage{hepnicenames}
\usepackage{hepunits}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage[%
    utf8
]{inputenc}
\usepackage{slashed}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{placeins}
\usepackage[%
    normalem
]{ulem}
\usepackage[%
    usenames,
    svgnames,
    dvipsnames
]{xcolor}


%% Shortcuts %%
\newcommand{\ie}{\textit{i.e.}}
\newcommand{\nuvec}{\vec{\nu}}
\newcommand{\refapp}[1]{appendix~\ref{app:#1}}
\newcommand{\refeq}[1]{eq.~(\ref{eq:#1})}
\newcommand{\refeqs}[2]{eqs.~(\ref{eq:#1})--(\ref{eq:#2})}
\newcommand{\reffig}[1]{figure~\ref{fig:#1}}
\newcommand{\refsec}[1]{section~\ref{sec:#1}}
\newcommand{\reftab}[1]{table~\ref{tab:#1}}
%\let\oldtheta\theta
%\renewcommand{\theta}{\vartheta}
\newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
\newcommand{\para}{\parallel}
\newcommand{\Gfermi}{G_F}
%\newcommand{\dd}[2][]{{\mathrm{d}^{#1}}#2\,}
\newcommand{\dd}{\ensuremath{\textrm{d}}}
\newcommand{\order}[1]{\ensuremath{\mathcal{O}\left(#1\right)}}
\DeclareMathOperator{\sign}{sgn}
\DeclareMathOperator{\ReNew}{Re}
\DeclareMathOperator{\ImNew}{Im}
\let\Re\ReNew
\let\Im\ImNew
\DeclareMathOperator*{\sumint}{%
\mathchoice%
  {\ooalign{$\displaystyle\sum$\cr\hidewidth$\displaystyle\int$\hidewidth\cr}}
  {\ooalign{\raisebox{.14\height}{\scalebox{.7}{$\textstyle\sum$}}\cr\hidewidth$\textstyle\int$\hidewidth\cr}}
  {\ooalign{\raisebox{.2\height}{\scalebox{.6}{$\scriptstyle\sum$}}\cr$\scriptstyle\int$\cr}}
  {\ooalign{\raisebox{.2\height}{\scalebox{.6}{$\scriptstyle\sum$}}\cr$\scriptstyle\int$\cr}}
}
\DeclareMathOperator*{\argmax}{arg\,max}
\newcommand{\wilson}[2][]{\mathcal{C}^\text{#1}_{#2}}
\newcommand{\op}[1]{\mathcal{O}_{#1}}
\newcommand{\la}{\langle}
\newcommand{\ra}{\rangle}
\newcommand{\eqa}[1]{\begin{eqnarray} #1 \end{eqnarray}}


\def\deriv {\ensuremath{\mathrm{d}}}
\def\qsq       {\ensuremath{q^2}\xspace}

\def\PB      {\ensuremath{\mathrm{B}}\xspace}    
\def\B       {{\ensuremath{\PB}}\xspace}
\def\PK      {\ensuremath{\mathrm{K}}\xspace}   
\def\kaon    {{\ensuremath{\PK}}\xspace}
\def\Kstarz  {{\ensuremath{\kaon^{*0}}}\xspace}
\def\Bd      {{\ensuremath{\B^0}}\xspace}
\def\Bz      {{\ensuremath{\B^0}}\xspace}

%% Key decay channels

\def\BdToKstmm    {\decay{\Bd}{\Kstarz\mup\mun}}
\def\BdbToKstmm   {\decay{\Bdb}{\Kstarzb\mup\mun}}

\def\BsToJPsiPhi  {\decay{\Bs}{\jpsi\phi}}
\def\BdToJPsiKst  {\decay{\Bd}{\jpsi\Kstarz}}
\def\BdbToJPsiKst {\decay{\Bdb}{\jpsi\Kstarzb}}

%% Rare decays
\def\BdKstee  {\decay{\Bd}{\Kstarz\epem}}
\def\BdbKstee {\decay{\Bdb}{\Kstarzb\epem}}
\def\bsll     {\decay{\bquark}{\squark \ell^+ \ell^-}}

\def\lepton     {{\ensuremath{\ell}}\xspace}
\def\ellm       {{\ensuremath{\ell^-}}\xspace}
\def\ellp       {{\ensuremath{\ell^+}}\xspace}
\def\ellell     {\ensuremath{\ell^+ \ell^-}\xspace}
\def\mumu       {{\ensuremath{\Pmu^+\Pmu^-}}\xspace}

\def\lhcb {\mbox{LHCb}\xspace}
\def\belle  {\mbox{Belle}\xspace}

\def\WC  {\ensuremath{\mathcal{C}}\xspace}



\begin{document}

\allowdisplaybreaks

\preprint{ZU-TH-15/18}
\title{Towards establishing Lepton Flavour Universality violation in $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ decays}
\author{Andrea Mauri}
\email{a.mauri@cern.ch}
\author{Nicola Serra}
\email{nicola.serra@cern.ch}
\author{Rafael Silva Coutinho}
\email{rafael.silva.coutinho@cern.ch}
\affiliation{Physik-Institut, Universit\"at Z\"urich, Winterthurer Strasse 190, 8057 Z\"urich, Switzerland}

\begin{abstract}
  Rare semileptonic $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ transitions provide some of the most promising framework to search for new physics effects. 
Recent analyses of these decays have indicated an anomalous behaviour in measurements
  of angular distributions of the decay $B^0\to
    K^*\mu^+\mu^-$ and lepton-flavour-universality observables. 
Unambiguously establishing if these  deviations have a common nature
 is of paramount importance in order to understand the observed pattern. 
  We propose a novel approach to independently and complementary
  probe this hypothesis   
  by performing a simultaneous amplitude analysis of $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{K}^{*0} \mu^+\mu^-$  and $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{K}^{*0} e^+e^-$ decays. 
  This method enables the direct determination of  
  observables that encode potential non-equal couplings of muons and electrons,  
  and are found to be insensitive to non-perturbative QCD effects. 
If current hints of new physics are confirmed, our approach could
allow an early discovery of physics beyond the Standard
Model with LHCb Run-II datasets. 
\end{abstract}

\maketitle

Flavour changing neutral current processes of {\textit{B}} meson decays 
are crucial probes for the Standard Model (SM), 
since as-yet undiscovered particles may contribute to these transitions and cause observables to deviate  
from their SM predictions~\cite{Grossman:1996ke,Fleischer:1996bv,London:1997zk,Ciuchini:1997zp}.
The decay mode $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ is a prime example (\textit{i.e.} $\ell = \mu, e$), 
which offers a rich framework to study from differential decay widths to angular observables.
An anomalous behaviour in angular and branching fraction analyses of the decay channel 
$\bar{B}^{0} \to \bar{K}^{*0} \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ has been recently reported~\cite{Aaij:2015oid,Wehle:2016yoi,Aaij:2013aln,Aaij:2014pli}, 
notably in one of the observables with reduced theoretical uncertainties, 
$P^{\prime}_{5}$~\cite{Aaij:2013qta,Descotes-Genon:2015uva}.
Several models have been suggested in order to interpret these results as new physics (NP) 
signatures~\cite{Gauld:2013qja,Buras:2013qja,Altmannshofer:2013foa,Crivellin:2015era,Hiller:2014yaa,Biswas:2014gga,Gripaios:2014tna}.  
Nonetheless, the vector-like nature of this pattern could be also explained by 
non-perturbative QCD contributions from $b\to s c{\bar{c}}$ operators ({\textit{i.e.}} charm loops) 
that are able to either mimic or camouflage NP effects~\cite{Jager:2012uw,Jager:2014rwa,Ciuchini:2015qxb}. 
Non-standard measurement in ratios of $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ processes 
- such as of $R_{K}$~\cite{Aaij:2014ora} and $R_{K^{*}}$~\cite{Aaij:2017vbb} - 
indicate a suppression of the muon channel which is also compatible with the $P^{\prime}_{5}$ anomaly. 
In this case an immediate interpretation of lepton flavour universality (LFU) breaking is 
suggested due to the small theoretical uncertainties in their predictions~\cite{Hiller:2003js,Bordone:2016gaq}. 
Whilst the individual level of significance of the present anomalies is still inconclusive, 
there is an appealing non-trivial consistent pattern shown in 
global analysis fits~\cite{Capdevila:2017bsm,Altmannshofer:2017yso,Hurth:2017hxg,Ciuchini:2017mik,Alok:2017sui}.

The formalism of {\textit{b}} decays is commonly described within 
an effective field theory~\cite{Altmannshofer:2008dz}, 
which probes distinct energy scales; 
with regimes classified into short-distance (high energies) perturbative 
and non-calculable long-distance effects. 
These can be parametrised in the weak Lagrangian in terms of 
effective operators with different Lorentz structures, $\mathcal{O}_i$, 
with corresponding couplings $\mathcal{C}_i$ - referred to as Wilson coefficients (WC). 
Only a subset of the operators that are most sensitive to NP is examined in this work~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj}, 
\textit{i.e.} $\mathcal{O}_7$ (virtual photon exchanges), $\mathcal{O}_{9,10}$ (vector and axial currents) 
and corresponding right-handed couplings with flipped helicities. 
In this framework NP effects are incorporated 
by introducing deviations in the WCs~\cite{Ali:1994bf} from their SM predictions,  
{\textit{i.e.}} $\mathcal{C}_i = \mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{SM}}_i + \mathcal{C}^{\mathrm{NP}}_i$. 
For instance, the anomalous pattern seen in semileptonic decays can be 
explained by a shift in the coefficient $\mathcal{C}_9$ only, 
or $\mathcal{C}_9$ and $\mathcal{C}_{10}$ simultaneously~\cite{Capdevila:2017bsm,Altmannshofer:2017yso,Hurth:2017hxg}. 
A direct experimental determination of the WCs is currently 
bounded by sizeable uncertainties that arise from 
non-factorisable hadronic matrix elements that are difficult to assess reliably from first principles. 
Some promising approaches suggest to extract this contribution 
from data-driven analyses~\cite{Blake:2017fyh,Hurth:2017sqw} 
and by exploiting analytical properties of its structure~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj}. 
However, these models still have intrinsic limitations, in particular 
in the assumptions that enter in parametrisation of the di-lepton invariant mass distribution. 

In this Letter we propose a new \textit{model-independent} approach that 
from a simultaneous unbinned amplitude analysis of both  
$\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{K}^{*0} \mu^+\mu^-$  and $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{K}^{*0} e^+e^-$ decays 
can, for the first time, unambiguously determine LFU-breaking from direct measurements of WCs. 
This work builds on the generalisation of Ref.~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj}, 
but it is insensitive to the model assumptions of the parametrisation. 
This effect relies on the strong correlation between the muon and electron modes 
imposed by the lepton-flavour universality of the hadronic matrix elements. 
Furthermore, in this method the full set of observables  
(\textit{e.g} $R_{K^{*}}$, $P^{\prime}_{5}$ and branching fraction measurements) available in $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$  
decays is exploited, providing unprecedented precision on LFU in a single analysis.

Consider the differential decay rate for $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ 
decays (dominated by the on-shell $\bar{K}^{*0}$ contribution) 
fully described by four kinematic variables;  
the di-lepton squared invariant mass, $q^2$, and the three angles 
$\vec{\Omega} = (\cos \theta_\ell, \cos \theta_K, \phi)$~\cite{Altmannshofer:2008dz}.
The probability density function ($p.d.f.$) for this decay can be written as
%
\begin{equation}
p.d.f.  = \frac{1}{\Gamma} \frac{\dd^4 \Gamma}{\dd q^2 \dd^3 \Omega}, \
    \quad
    \text{with}\quad
    \Gamma = \int_{q^2} \dd q^2 \frac{\dd\Gamma}{\dd q^2}\,,
\end{equation}
%
with different \qsq intervals depending on the lepton flavour under study. 
For a complete definition of $\dd ^4\Gamma/(\dd q^2 \dd ^3\Omega)$ we refer 
to~\cite{Bobeth:2008ij,Altmannshofer:2008dz} and references therein.
It is convenient to explicitly write the WC dependence on the decay width by 
the transversity amplitudes ($\lambda=\perp, \para,0$) as~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj}
%
\eqa{
  \label{eq:amp_dep}
  {\cal{A}}_{\lambda}^{(\ell)\,L,R} &=& {\cal{N}}_{\lambda}^{(\ell)}\ \bigg\{ 
(C^{(\ell)}_9 \mp C^{(\ell)}_{10}) {\cal{F}}_{\lambda}(q^2) \\
%
&&+\frac{2m_b M_B}{q^2} \bigg[ C^{(\ell)}_7 {\cal{F}}_{\lambda}^{T}(q^2) - 16\pi^2 \frac{M_B}{m_b} {\cal{H}}_{\lambda}(q^2) \bigg]
\bigg\}\,,\nonumber 
}
where ${\cal{N}}_{\lambda}^{(\ell)}$ is a normalisation factor, and 
${\cal{F}}^{(T)}_{\lambda}(q^{2})$ and $\mathcal{H}_\lambda(q^{2})$ 
are referred to ``local'' and ``non-local'' hadronic matrix elements, respectively.  
The ${\cal{F}}^{(T)}_{\lambda}(q^{2})$ are form factors, 
while $\mathcal{H}_\lambda(q^{2})$ encode the aforementioned non-factorisable
hadronic contributions and
are described using two complementary parametrisations~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj,Hurth:2017sqw} - 
for brevity only a subset of results is shown for the latter approach.
In the following
this function is expressed in terms of a ``conformal'' 
variable $z(q^{2})$~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj,Boyd:1995cf,Bourrely:2008za}, 
with an analytical expansion truncated at a given order  
$z^n$ (herein referred to as $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^n]$), 
after removing singularities related to the $J/\psi(1S)$ and $\psi(2S)$. 
Some of the drawbacks of this expansion is that \textit{a-priori} there is 
no physics argument to justify the order of the polynomial to be curtailed at - 
%or even if this series will ever converge - 
which in turn currently limits any claim on NP sensitivity. 

In order to overcome these points, we investigate the LFU-breaking
hypothesis using direct determinations of the difference of Wilson coefficients 
between muons and electrons, \textit{i.e.} 
\begin{equation}
\Delta \WC_i = \widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_i^{(\mu)} - \widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_i^{(e)}\,,
\end{equation}
where the usual WCs $\mathcal{C}_i^{(\mu,e)}$ are renamed as $\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_i^{(\mu,e)}$, 
since an accurate disentanglement between the physical 
meaning of $\WC_i^{(\mu,e)}$ and the above-mentioned hadronic pollution 
cannot be achieved at the current stage of the theory~\cite{Chrzaszcz:2018yza}.
The key feature of this strategy is to realise that all hadronic matrix elements 
are known to be lepton-flavour universal, and thus are shared among both semileptonic decays.
This benefits from the large statistics available for $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{K}^{*0} \mu^+\mu^-$ decays 
that is sufficient to enable the determination of these multi-space parameters. 
Note that an amplitude analysis of the electron mode only has been previously disregarded, 
given the limited dataset in either LHCb or Belle experiments.
In a common framework the hadronic contributions are treated as 
nuisance parameters, while only the Wilson coefficients $\widetilde{\WC}_9^{(\mu,e)}$ 
and $\widetilde{\WC}_{10}^{(\mu,e)}$ are kept separately for the two channels.
For consistency the WC $\widetilde{C}_{7}$ is also shared in the fit 
and fixed to its SM value, given its universal coupling to photons
and the strong constraint from radiative $B$ decays~\cite{Paul:2016urs}. 
In the following, all the right-handed WCs are fixed to their SM values, \textit{i.e.} $\WC_i^{\prime\,(\mu,e)} = 0$,
while sensitivity studies on the determination of the WCs $\WC_9^{\prime\,(\mu)}$ and  $\WC_{10}^{\prime\,(\mu)}$
are detailed in the supplemental material to this Letter~\cite{appendix}.

Signal-only ensembles of pseudo-experiments are generated with
sample size corresponding roughly to the yields foreseen in LHCb Run-II [$8\,$fb$^{-1}$] and future upgrades 
[$50\,$-$\,300\,$fb$^{-1}$]~\cite{Aaij:2244311}, and Belle II [$50\,$ab$^{-1}$].
These are extrapolated from Refs.~\cite{Aaij:2015oid,Aaij:2017vbb,Wehle:2016yoi} 
by scaling respectively with luminosity and $\sigma_{b\bar{b}} \propto \sqrt{s}$ 
for LHCb, where $s$ denotes the designed centre-of-mass energy of the $b$-quark pair, 
and exclusively with luminosity for Belle II.
%by scaling respectively with $\sigma_{b\bar{b}} \propto \sqrt{s}$ and $\sigma_{b\bar{b}} \propto s$ 
%for LHCb and Belle II, where $s$ denotes the designed centre-of-mass
%energy of the $b$-quark pair.  
Note that for brevity most of the results are shown for the representative
scenario of LHCb Run-II. 
The studied \qsq range corresponds to 
$1.1\,\GeV^2 \leq q^2 \leq 8.0\,\GeV^2$ and $11.0\,\GeV^2  \leq q^2 \leq 12.5\,\GeV^2$ for 
the muon mode and $1.1\,\GeV^2  \leq q^2 \leq 7.0\,\GeV^2$ for the electron mode in LHCb;
while in Belle II the same kinematic regions are considered for both semileptonic channels, namely 
$1.1\,\GeV^2  \leq q^2 \leq 8.0\,\GeV^2$ and $10.0\,\GeV^2  
\leq q^2 \leq 13.0\,\GeV^2$. 
This definition of \qsq ranges are broadly consistent with published results, 
and assumes improvements in the electron mode resolution for LHCb~\cite{Lionetto:XX}.  

Within the SM setup the Wilson coefficients are set to  
$\mathcal{C}^{\rm{SM}}_9 = 4.27$, $\mathcal{C}^{\rm{SM}}_{10} = - 4.17$ and $\mathcal{C}^{\rm{SM}}_7 = -0.34$ (see~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj} and references therein), 
corresponding to a fixed renormalisation scale of $\mu = 4.2\,$GeV.
This baseline model is modified for two NP benchmark points (BMP), 
$\Delta\WC_9 = - 1$ and $\Delta\WC_9 = - \Delta\WC_{10} = - 0.7$,
referred respectively to as \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$ and \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_{9,10}}$,  
where NP is inserted only in the case of muons, \textit{i.e.} $\WC_i^{(e)} = \WC_i^{\rm{SM}}$.
These points are favoured by several global fit 
analyses with similar significance~\cite{Capdevila:2017bsm,Altmannshofer:2017yso,Hurth:2017hxg}. 

An extended unbinned maximum likelihood fit is performed to these simulated samples, 
in which multivariate Gaussian terms are added to the log-likelihood to incorporate prior knowledge
on the nuisance parameters.
In order to probe the model-independence of the framework, the non-local hadronic 
parametrisation is modified in several ways, \textit{i.e.}
%
\begin{enumerate}
    %
    \item[i.] baseline $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^2]$ SM prediction~\cite{Bobeth:2017vxj} 
    included as a multivariate Gaussian constraint;
    %
    \item[ii.] no theoretical assumption on $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^2]$ 
    and with free-floating parameters;
    %
  \item[iii.] higher orders of the analytical expansion of $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^{n}]$ 
    up to $z^3$ and $z^4$ - free floating;
    %
    \item[iv.] and re-parametrisation of its description as  
      proposed in Ref.~\cite{Hurth:2017sqw}, \textit{i.e.}
      using instead an expansion in terms of $1 + a_{\lambda} + b_{\lambda}(q^{2}/6\,$GeV$^{2})$. 

    %
\end{enumerate}
On the other hand, form factors parameters are taken from~\cite{Straub:2015ica} and, in order 
to guarantee a good agreement between Light-Cone Sum Rules~\cite{Ball:1998kk,Khodjamirian:2006st} 
and Lattice results~\cite{Becirevic:2006nm,Horgan:2013hoa}, 
their uncertainties are doubled with respect to Ref.~\cite{Straub:2015ica}.

 
Figure~\ref{fig:C9ellipse} shows the fit results for several alternative parametrisations 
of the non-local hadronic contribution for the \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$ hypothesis, 
with yields corresponding to LHCb Run-II scenario.  
We observe that the sensitivity to $\widetilde{\WC}_9^{(\mu,e)}$ is strongly dependent on 
the model assumption used for the non-local matrix elements. 
Nonetheless, it is noticeable that the high correlation of the  
$\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_9^{(\mu)}$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_9^{(e)}$ coefficients 
is sufficient to preserve the true underlying physics at any order of the series expansion $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^n]$
and without any parametric theoretical input,  
\textit{i.e.} the two-dimensional pull estimator with respect to the LFU hypothesis is unbiased. 
%
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{ellipses_C9.pdf} 
\caption{%
    Two-dimensional sensitivity scans for the pair of Wilson coefficients 
    $\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_9^{(\mu)}$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}_9^{(e)}$ 
    for different non-local hadronic parametrisation models evaluated at \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$,  
    and with the expected statistics after \lhcb Run II. 
    The contours correspond to 99\% confidence level statistical-only uncertainty bands and 
    the dotted black line indicates the LFU hypothesis.   
}
\label{fig:C9ellipse}
\end{figure}
%
We note that, as commonly stated in the literature (see \textit{e.g.} recent review in Ref.~\cite{Capdevila:2017ert}),  
the determination of $\WC_{10}^{(\mu,e)}$ is insensitive to the lack of knowledge on the 
non-local hadronic effects. Nevertheless, its precision is still bounded to the uncertainties on the form factors, 
that are found to be the limiting factor by the end of Run-II. 
%
\begin{figure}[bth!]
%\begin{center}
\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{ellipses_DeltaC9C10_a.pdf}\\%\quad\quad\quad\quad  
\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{ellipses_DeltaC9C10_b.pdf} 
\caption{%
    Two-dimensional sensitivity scans for the proposed observables $\Delta\WC_9$ and $\Delta\WC_{10}$ 
    for different non-local hadronic parametrisation models 
    evaluated at (top) \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$ and (bottom) \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_{9,10}}$, 
    and with the expected statistics after \lhcb Run II. 
    The contours correspond to 99\% confidence level statistical-only uncertainty bands.
    \label{fig:DeltaC9C10}
}
%\end{center}
\end{figure}

The sensitivity to the two benchmark-like NP scenarios using the proposed pseudo observables $\Delta \WC_i$
is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:DeltaC9C10}. 
We quantify the maximal expected significance with respect to the SM to be $4.6$ and $5.3\,\sigma$ for 
\texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$ and \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_{9,10}}$, respectively. 
Realistic experimental effects are necessary to determine the exact sensitivity achievable.
Nevertheless, these results suggest that a first observation (with a single measurement) of LFU breaking 
appears to be feasible with the expected recorded statistics by the end of LHCb Run II. 
Furthermore, it is interesting to examine the prospects for confirming this evidence in the upcoming LHCb/Belle 
upgrades~\cite{Albrecht:2017odf}. 
Figure~\ref{fig:DeltaC9C10_Upgrade} summarises the two-dimensional statistical-only significances  
for the designed luminosities. 
Both LHCb Upgrade and Belle II experiments have comparable sensitivities (within $8.0-10\,\sigma$), 
while LHCb High-Lumi has an overwhelming significance.  
These unprecedented datasets will not only yield insights on this phenomena but also 
enable a deeper understanding of the nature of NP - 
insensitive to both local and non-local hadronic uncertainties.


\begin{figure}[bth!]
\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{ellipses_DeltaC9C10_Nev.pdf}
\caption{%
    Two-dimensional sensitivity scans for the proposed observables $\Delta\WC_9$ and $\Delta\WC_{10}$ 
    for the two considered NP scenarios: (green) \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$ and (red) \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_{9,10}}$.
    The contours correspond to 99\% confidence level statistical-only uncertainty bands expected for the (dashed) \belle II 50~ab$^{-1}$ 
    and \lhcb Upgrade (dotted) $50\,$fb$^{-1}$  and (solid) $\,300\,$fb$^{-1}$ statistics.
    \label{fig:DeltaC9C10_Upgrade}
}
\end{figure}

Experimental resolution and detector acceptance/efficiency effects  
are not considered in this work, as these would require further information
from current (non-public) or planned \textit{B}-physics experiments.
Nevertheless, preliminary studies on the impact of a finite \qsq resolution are performed 
assuming a \qsq-constant asymmetric smearing of the di-lepton invariant mass 
in the electron mode; the size and asymmetry of such smearing is naively chosen
to reproduce the mass fits of Ref.~\cite{Aaij:2017vbb}.
Despite the low \qsq asymmetric tail, the determination of $\Delta\WC_9$ and 
$\Delta\WC_{10}$ remains unbiased, even if no-correction is
applied. 
Moreover, the differential decay width can receive additional complex amplitudes from signal-like backgrounds,  
\textit{e.g.} $K\pi$ S-wave from a non-resonant decay and/or a scalar resonance (see detailed discussion in Ref.~\cite{Hurth:2017hxg}). 
These contributions are determined to be small~\cite{Aaij:2015oid,Aaij:2016flj}, 
and in the proposed formalism they benefit from the same description between the muon and electron mode.
Therefore, in this constrained framework these effects are even further suppressed and can then be neglected
for the scope of this work.

Another important test to probe the stability of the model consists in 
analysing potential issues that can rise if the truncation 
$\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^n]$ is not a good description of nature.
We proceed as follows: we generate ensembles with non-zero coefficients for 
$\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^3]$ and $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^4]$, and we perform the fit 
with $\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^2]$.
Despite the mis-modelling of the non-local hadronic effects in the fit, we observe 
that the determination of $\Delta\WC_9$ and $\Delta\WC_{10}$ is always unbiased, 
thanks to the relative cancellation of all the shared parameters between the two channels.
It is worth mentioning that a hypothetical determination of the individual  
$\widetilde{\WC}_9^{(\mu,e)}$ and $\widetilde{\WC}_{10}^{(\mu,e)}$ WCs 
can also produce a shift in their central values
that mimics the behaviour of NP~\cite{Chrzaszcz:2018yza}.% and makes impossible any claim in this direction.


%
In conclusion, we propose a clean and model-independent method to combine
all the available information from $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ decays for a precise 
determination of LFU-breaking differences of WCs, \textit{i.e.} $\Delta\WC_9$ 
and $\Delta\WC_{10}$.
This relies on a shared parametrisation of the local (form-factors) and non-local ($\mathcal{H}_\lambda[z^n]$)
hadronic matrix elements between the muonic and electronic channels, 
that in turn enables the determination of the observables of interest
free from any theoretical uncertainty.  
In addition, this simultaneous analysis is more robust against 
experimental effects such
as mismodeling of the detector resolution, since most parameters are
effectively determined from the muon mode. This would be an important
benefit for LHCb where the electron resolution is significantly worse
than that of muons. 
Figure~\ref{fig:allComponents} illustrates the usefulness of the newly-proposed observables by combining 
the different information from angular analysis to branching ratio measurements. 
Due to the inclusiveness of the approach, the expected sensitivity surpasses any 
of the projections for the foreseen measurements of \textit{e.g.} $R_{K^{*}}$ or $P^{\prime}_{5}$ alone - given the benchmark points.
Therefore, this novel formalism can be the most immediate method to observe unambiguously 
NP in $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ decays.

A promising feature of this framework is the possibility to extend the analysis to 
include other decay channels involving flavour changing neutral currents. 
For instance, the charged decay $\bar{B}^+ \to \bar{K}^{*+} \ellell$ undergoes the same physics 
and is easily accessible at the $B$-factories, while other rare 
semi-leptonic decays such as $B^+ \to K^+ \ellell$ and $\Lambda_{b} \to \Lambda^{(*)} \ell^+\ell^-$ 
have a different phenomenology but access the same NP information in terms of WC description.
Thus, an unbinned global simultaneous fit to all data involving $b \to s \ell^+ \ell^-$ transitions
is a natural and appealing extension of this work. 
Moreover, the parameter space of the investigated WCs can also be broadened to 
incorporate direct measurement of the right-handed $\WC_i^{\prime}$ - 
currently weakly constrained by global fits~\cite{Capdevila:2017bsm,Altmannshofer:2017yso,Hurth:2017hxg}. 
%
\begin{figure}[t]
\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{B2Kstll_summary.pdf} 
\caption{%
    Sensitivity to \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_{9,10}}$ scenario for the expected statistics after the \lhcb Run II.
    The relative contribution (68, 95, 99\% confidence level contours) of each step of the analysis is shown in different colours, 
    together with the result of full amplitude method proposed in this letter. 
    \label{fig:allComponents}
}
\end{figure}


We acknowledge useful contributions from Gino Isidori, Danny van Dyk and Patrick Owen.
This work is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) under contracts 173104 and 174182.   


%\newpage
%\FloatBarrier


\FloatBarrier
\bibliography{references}

\end{document}