diff --git a/draft.tex b/draft.tex
index a4c07a8..9f99547 100644
--- a/draft.tex
+++ b/draft.tex
@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@
 %when examining directly the difference in Wilson coefficients.
 Furthermore, in this method the full set of observables  
 (\textit{e.g} $R_{K^{*}}$, $P^{\prime}_{5}$ and branching fraction measurements) available in $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$  
-decays is exploited, and therefore, most stringent constraints on LFU for a single measurement can be expected.  
+decays is exploited, providing unprecedented precision on LFU in a single measurement.
+%and therefore, most stringent constraints on LFU for a single measurement can be expected.  
 
 %Let us consider the differential decay rate for $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ 
 Consider the differential decay rate for $\bar{B}\to \bar{K}^*\ell^+\ell^-$ 
@@ -314,7 +315,7 @@
 This benefits from the large statistics available for $\bar{B}^0 \to \bar{K}^{*0} \mu^+\mu^-$ decays 
 that is sufficient to enable the determination of these multi-space parameters. 
 Note that an amplitude analysis of the electron mode only has been previously disregarded, 
-given the limited dataset foreseen in either LHCb or Belle-II experiments.
+given the limited dataset in either LHCb or Belle experiments.
 In a common framework the hadronic contributions are treated as 
 nuisance parameters, while only the Wilson coefficients $\widetilde{\WC}_9^{(\mu,e)}$ 
 and $\widetilde{\WC}_{10}^{(\mu,e)}$ are kept separately for the two channels.