diff --git a/draft.tex b/draft.tex
index 8817166..b43a76a 100644
--- a/draft.tex
+++ b/draft.tex
@@ -381,11 +381,24 @@
 %and NP$_{\WC_9-\WC_{10}}$ in terms of the two model-independent LFU-breaking 
 %difference of Wilson coefficients $\Delta\WC_9$ and  $\Delta\WC_{10}$.
 We quantify the maximal expected significance to the SM as $4.6\,(5.3)\,\sigma$ for 
-the \lhcb Run II, $xx(yy)\,\sigma$ for \belle II 50~ab$^{-1}$ dataset and 
-$xx(yy)\,\sigma$ for the \lhcb 50~fb$^{-1}$ Upgrade for the NP$_{\WC_9}$ 
+the \lhcb Run II, $7.6(8.4)\,\sigma$ for \belle II 50~ab$^{-1}$ dataset and 
+$9.0(9.6)\,\sigma$ for the \lhcb 50~fb$^{-1}$ Upgrade for the NP$_{\WC_9}$ 
 (NP$_{\WC_9-\WC_{10}}$) scenario respectively.
 \textbf{TODO: Add also here the plot for the upgrade and also comment on the result itself.}
 
+
+\begin{figure}[bth!]
+\includegraphics[width=.4\textwidth]{plots/ellipses_DeltaC9C10_Nev.pdf}
+\caption{%
+    Two-dimensional sensitivity scans for the proposed observables $\Delta\WC_9$ and $\Delta\WC_{10}$ 
+    for different non-local hadronic parametrisation models 
+    evaluated at (left) \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_9}$ and (right) \texttt{BMP}$_{\WC_{9,10}}$, 
+    and with the expected statistics after \lhcb Run II. 
+    The contours correspond to $3\,\sigma$ statistical-only uncertainty bands.
+    \label{fig:DeltaC9C10_Nev}
+}
+\end{figure}
+
 Modelling detector effects such as \qsq and angles resolution, detector acceptance/efficiency, 
 is hardly possible without access to (non-public) information of the current 
 \textit{B}-physics experiments.