diff --git a/macros/CCEScan/voltageFit_spline.C b/macros/CCEScan/voltageFit_spline.C
index a97242b..31a1e49 100755
--- a/macros/CCEScan/voltageFit_spline.C
+++ b/macros/CCEScan/voltageFit_spline.C
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@
   // Scale them
   Info("voltageFit_spline","#chi^{2}/ndf: %6.2f/%d",fu_volt->GetChisquare(),fu_volt->GetNDF());
 
-  /*Michele
+  /*Michele, confirmed in 8/31 2017
   if (chi2ndf>0.00) {
     Info("voltageFit_spline","scaling");
     vr_adc_err_corr*=TMath::Sqrt(chi2ndf); 
@@ -419,6 +419,7 @@
   int iFirst  = -1;
   int iSecon  = -1;
   // Excluding first and last point as they have been artifically added
+  //Looking for the two voltages that are closest to Vdepl
   for(int i=1; i<vr_adc_err_corr.GetNoElements()-1; i++){
     if (iFirst==-1) {
       iFirst = i;
@@ -458,7 +459,7 @@
   // difference between the determined depletion voltage and the crossing point of the horizontal
   // top and the line extrapolated from (0,0)
   
-  double Vdepl_sys1 = Vdepl_val-fu_volt->GetParameter("A_{0}")/s5_volt->Derivative(0.0);
+  double Vdepl_sys1 = Vdepl_val-fu_volt->GetParameter("A_{0}")/s5_volt->Derivative(0.0);  //Wrong, sometimes this is a bad indication!
   
   // Alternative determination of the systematic uncertainty by taking the
   // difference between the determined depletion voltage and the extracted value from the sigmoid function