- \documentclass[xcolor=svgnames]{beamer}
- \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
- \usepackage[english]{babel}
- \usepackage{polski}
- %\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
- %\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
- %\usepackage{amsmath}
- %\newcommand\abs[1]{\left|#1\right|}
- \usepackage{amsmath}
- \newcommand\abs[1]{\left|#1\right|}
- \usepackage{hepnicenames}
- \usepackage{hepunits}
- \usepackage{color}
- \usepackage{feynmp}
- \usepackage{pst-pdf}
- \usepackage{hyperref}
- \usepackage{xcolor}
-
- \setbeamertemplate{footline}{\insertframenumber/\inserttotalframenumber}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \definecolor{mygreen}{cmyk}{0.82,0.11,1,0.25}
-
-
- \usetheme{Sybila}
- \title[Overlap or $\color{white} B^0 \to K^{\ast} \mu \mu$, PPTS meeting]{Overlap for $\color{white} B^0 \to K^{\ast} \mu \mu$}
-
- \author[Marcin Chrzaszcz]{
- Thomas Blake\inst{1}, \underline{Marcin Chrzaszcz}\inst{2,3}, Sam Cunliffe\inst{4}, Christoph Langenbruch\inst{1}, Konstantinos Petridis\inst{4}, Nicola Serra\inst{2}}
-
- \institute[UW, UZH, IFJ, IC]{
- $ ^1$ University of Warwick\\
- $ ^2$ University of Zurich\\
- $ ^3$ Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow\\
- $ ^4$ Imperial College London\\{~}\\
-
- Physics Performance, Trigger and Stripping meeting
- }
- \date{\today}
- \begin{document}
- % --------------------------- SLIDE --------------------------------------------
- \frame[plain]{\titlepage}
- \author{Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz}
- % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- % --------------------------- SLIDE --------------------------------------------
-
- \institute{~(UZH, IFJ)}
-
-
- % \begin{frame}\frametitle{Outline}
- % \begin{enumerate}
- % \item introduction\vspace{.5em}
- % \item multivariate technique\vspace{.5em}
- % \item normalisation\vspace{.5em}
- % % \item backgrounds\vspace{.5em}
- % \item expected sensitivity\vspace{.5em}
- % \item model dependence\vspace{.5em} data from Reco14Stripping20(r1)
- % \end{enumerate}
- % Major news wrt.\ the $1~fb^{-1}$ analysis are highlighted in \textcolor{mygreen}{green}
- % \end{frame}
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Outline}
- \tableofcontents
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Yellow pages}
- Previous presentations:
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $\PBzero \to \PKstar \mu \mu$ meeting: \href{https://indico.cern.ch/event/290864/contribution/0/material/slides/0.pdf}{\url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/290864/contribution/0/material/slides/0.pdf}}.
- \item $\PBzero \to \PKstar \mu \mu$ meeting: \href{https://indico.cern.ch/event/290864/contribution/2/material/slides/1.pdf}{\url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/290864/contribution/2/material/slides/1.pdf}}.
-
- \item PPTS meeting: \href{https://indico.cern.ch/event/288654/contribution/2/material/slides/0.pdf}{\url{https://indico.cern.ch/event/288654/contribution/2/material/slides/0.pdf}}.
-
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
- \section{Introduction}
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{What we are trying to explain}
- In July we freeze the selection for $\PBzero \to \PKstar \mu \mu$: \href{https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/LHCbPhysics/BdToKstarMuMu/LHCb-INT-2013-058_v1r1.pdf}{LHCb-INT-2013-058}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item New selection is based on simplified BDT:(less variables, larger dataset)
- \item Modified vetoes for exclusive backgrounds
- \item Moved from Stripping 17 RECO12 $\to$ Stripping 20 RECO14.
- \item A question raised by Tom:
- \begin{itemize}
- \item \begin{center}
- ''What is the overlap for the new and old selection\\
- on the 2011 data sample?''
- \end{center}
- \end{itemize}
- \item By product: check any potential bias of events not common in both RECOs, check how well we can model this things in MC(needed for acceptance corrections),
- % \item First attempt: Take old ntuples and match events using a unique numbers: event-number and run-number.
-
-
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \section{Data driven studies}
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Data comparison}
-
- \begin{block}{Method 1:}
- {~}{~}Take old ntuples and match events using a unique numbers: event-number and run-number. Study the missing events from one data sample.
- \end{block}
- \begin{columns}
-
- \column{0.1in}{~}
- \column{2.1in}
- \begin{exampleblock}{Advantages}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Comparing directly samples that we do our analysis on.
-
-
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{exampleblock}
-
-
- \column{2.1in}
- \begin{alertblock}{Disadvantages}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Different stripping.
- \item Not easy to disentangle different contributions.
- \item Event alignment problems(recovered).
- \end{itemize}
- \end{alertblock}
-
-
-
- \end{columns}
- Data samples used for studies:
- \begin{itemize}
- \item RECO12, Stripping 17, full selection, old BDT. Fixed sample.
- \item RECO14, Stripping 20, full selection.
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \frame{
- \frametitle{with BDT, signal region}
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{r r r r r r r r}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline \hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $162$ & $156$ & $105$ & $57$ & $51$ & $64.8$ & $49.3$\\ \hline
- $[2, 4]$ & $101$ & $91$ & $60$ & $41$ & $31$ & $59.4$ & $45.5$\\ \hline
- $[4, 6]$ & $111$ & $107$ & $66$ & $45$ & $41$ & $59.5$ & $43.4 $\\ \hline
- $[6, 8]$ & $165$ & $144$ & $98$ & $67$ & $46$ & $59.4$ & $46.4$\\ \hline
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $102102$ & $105000$ & $77678$ & $24424$ & $27322$ & $76.1$ & $60.0$\\ \hline
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $88$ & $110$ & $63$ & $25$ & $47$ & $71.6$ & $46.7$\\ \hline
- $[15, 17]$ & $121$ & $148$ & $88$ & $33$ & $60$ & $72.7 $ & $48.6$\\ \hline
- $[17, 19]$ & $79$ & $109$ & $59$ & $20$ & $50$ & $74.7$ & $45.7$\\
- \hline
- \end{tabular}
- }
- {~~}\\{~~}\\
- Helicity angles in different RECO samples:\\
- \begin{center}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{notaligned_withbdt/overlap_costhetak.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{notaligned_withbdt/overlap_costhetal.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{notaligned_withbdt/overlap_phi.pdf}
-
- \end{columns}
- \end{center}
-
- }
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \frame{
- \frametitle{with BDT, background region}
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $33$ & $11$ & $2$ & $31$ & $9$ & $6.1$ & $4.8$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $50$ & $25$ & $10$ & $40$ & $15$ & $20.0$ & $15.4$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $37$ & $28$ & $4$ & $33$ & $24$ & $10.8$ & $6.6$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $32$ & $32$ & $7$ & $25$ & $25$ & $21.9$ & $12.3$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $1751$ & $1773$ & $549$ & $1202$ & $1224$ & $31.4$ & $18.5$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $35$ & $25$ & $9$ & $26$ & $16$ & $25.7$ & $17.6$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $27$ & $18$ & $5$ & $22$ & $13$ & $18.5$ & $12.5$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $27$ & $15$ & $1$ & $26$ & $14$ & $3.7$ & $2.4$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }
- }
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \frame{
- \frametitle{without BDT, signal region}
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $162$ & $320$ & $119$ & $43$ & $201$ & $73.5$ & $32.8$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $101$ & $416$ & $75$ & $26$ & $341$ & $74.3$ & $17.0$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $111$ & $409$ & $78$ & $33$ & $331$ & $70.3$ & $17.6$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $165$ & $499$ & $118$ & $47$ & $381$ & $71.5$ & $21.6$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $102102$ & $125084$ & $83995$ & $18107$ & $41089$ & $82.3$ & $58.7$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $88$ & $359$ & $69$ & $19$ & $290$ & $78.4$ & $18.3$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $121$ & $478$ & $99$ & $22$ & $379$ & $81.8$ & $19.8$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $79$ & $377$ & $65$ & $14$ & $312$ & $82.3$ & $16.6$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }
- {~~}\\{~~}\\
- Helicity angles in different RECO samples:\\
- \begin{center}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{notaligned_withoutbdt/overlap_costhetak.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{notaligned_withoutbdt/overlap_costhetal.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{notaligned_withoutbdt/overlap_phi.pdf}
-
- \end{columns}
- \end{center}
- }
- \frame{
- \frametitle{without BDT, background region}
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $33$ & $457$ & $18$ & $15$ & $439$ & $54.5$ & $3.8$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $50$ & $643$ & $33$ & $17$ & $610$ & $66.0$ & $5.0$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $37$ & $634$ & $18$ & $19$ & $616$ & $48.6$ & $2.8$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $32$ & $650$ & $21$ & $11$ & $629$ & $65.6$ & $3.2$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $1751$ & $7976$ & $857$ & $894$ & $7119$ & $48.9$ & $9.7$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $35$ & $466$ & $23$ & $12$ & $443$ & $65.7$ & $4.8$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $27$ & $603$ & $16$ & $11$ & $587$ & $59.3$ & $2.6$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $27$ & $678$ & $16$ & $11$ & $662$ & $59.3$ & $2.3$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }
- }
-
- \frame{
- \frametitle{with BDT, $p_T>250\MeV$, signal region}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $p_T$ was inherit from CommonParticles in S17, removed in S20.
- \end{itemize}
- {~}\\
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $147$ & $136$ & $101$ & $46$ & $35$ & $68.7$ & $55.5$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $89$ & $79$ & $59$ & $30$ & $20$ & $66.3$ & $54.1$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $100$ & $86$ & $60$ & $40$ & $26$ & $60.0$ & $47.6$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $143$ & $117$ & $92$ & $51$ & $25$ & $64.3$ & $54.8$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $95946$ & $95224$ & $74711$ & $21235$ & $20513$ & $77.9$ & $64.2$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $83$ & $94$ & $62$ & $21$ & $32$ & $74.75$ & $53.9$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $112$ & $121$ & $83$ & $29$ & $38$ & $74.1$ & $55.3$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $73$ & $84$ & $58$ & $15$ & $26$ & $79.5$ & $58.6$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }
- {~~}\\{~~}\\
- Helicity angles in different RECO samples:\\
- \begin{center}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{aligned_withbdt/overlap_costhetak.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{aligned_withbdt/overlap_costhetal.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{aligned_withbdt/overlap_phi.pdf}
-
- \end{columns}
- \end{center}
- }
-
- \frame{
- \frametitle{with BDT, $p_T>250\MeV$, background region}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $p_T$ was inherit from CommonParticles in S17, removed in S20.
- \end{itemize}
- {~}\\
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $31$ & $4$ & $2$ & $29$ & $2$ & $6.5$ & $6.1$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $46$ & $16$ & $8$ & $38$ & $8$ & $17.4$ & $14.8$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $34$ & $15$ & $4$ & $30$ & $11$ & $11.82$ & $8.9$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $29$ & $17$ & $7$ & $22$ & $10$ & $24.1$ & $17.9$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $1420$ & $1138$ & $522$ & $898$ & $616$ & $36.8$ & $25.6$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $31$ & $14$ & $9$ & $22$ & $5$ & $29.0$ & $25.0$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $25$ & $12$ & $5$ & $20$ & $7$ & $20.0$ & $15.6$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $25$ & $7$ & $1$ & $24$ & $6$ & $4.0$ & $3.2$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }
- }
-
- \frame{
- \frametitle{without BDT, $p_T>250~\MeV$, signal region}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $p_T$ was inherit from CommonParticles in S17, removed in S20.
- \end{itemize}
- {~}\\
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $147$ & $215$ & $113$ & $34$ & $102$ & $76.9$ & $45.4$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $89$ & $211$ & $70$ & $19$ & $141$ & $78.7$ & $30.4$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $100$ & $209$ & $71$ & $29$ & $138$ & $71.0$ & $29.8$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $143$ & $284$ & $109$ & $34$ & $175$ & $76.2$ & $34.3$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $95946$ & $110137$ & $80481$ & $15465$ & $29656$ & $83.9$ & $64.1$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $83$ & $209$ & $68$ & $15$ & $141$ & $81.9$ & $30.4$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $112$ & $268$ & $92$ & $20$ & $176$ & $82.1$ & $31.9$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $73$ & $187$ & $63$ & $10$ & $124$ & $86.3$ & $32.0$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $q^2$ trend is worrying. Can suggests kinematic dependence?
- \end{itemize}
-
- Helicity angles in different RECO samples:\\
- \begin{center}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{aligned_withoutbdt/overlap_costhetak.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{aligned_withoutbdt/overlap_costhetal.pdf}
- \column{1.7in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{aligned_withoutbdt/overlap_phi.pdf}
-
- \end{columns}
- \end{center}
- }
-
- \frame{
- \frametitle{without BDT, $p_T>250~\MeV$, background region}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $p_T$ was inherit from CommonParticles in S17, removed in S20.
- \end{itemize}
- {~}\\
- \scalebox{0.65}{
- \begin{tabular}{rrrrrrrr}\hline
- $q^2 [\GeV^2]$ & $N_{\rm old}$ & $N_{\rm new}$ & $N_{\rm common}$ & $N_{\rm old}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm new}^{\rm only}$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old} [\%]$ & $N_{\rm common}/N_{\rm old\,\cup\,new} [\%]$\\ \hline\hline
- $[0.1, 2]$ & $31$ & $233$ & $18$ & $13$ & $215$ & $58.1$ & $7.3$\\
- $[2, 4]$ & $46$ & $295$ & $31$ & $15$ & $264$ & $67.4$ & $10.0$\\
- $[4, 6]$ & $34$ & $294$ & $17$ & $17$ & $277$ & $50.0$ & $5.5$\\
- $[6, 8]$ & $29$ & $344$ & $20$ & $9$ & $324$ & $69.0$ & $5.7$\\
- $(m_{\PJpsi}\pm0.05)^2$ & $1420$ & $4037$ & $802$ & $618$ & $3235$ & $56.5$ & $17.2$\\
- $[11, 12.5]$ & $31$ & $258$ & $20$ & $11$ & $238$ & $64.5$ & $7.4$\\
- $[15, 17]$ & $25$ & $288$ & $15$ & $10$ & $273$ & $60.0$ & $5.0$\\
- $[17, 19]$ & $25$ & $301$ & $12$ & $13$ & $289$ & $48.0$ & $3.8$\\
- \hline\end{tabular}
- }}
-
-
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Kinematics comparison}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{tom.png}
- \end{center}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Clear lack of high $p_T$ tracks in RECO 14
- \item Still investigating.
- \item Check, effects are independent of polarity.
- \end{itemize}
-
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \section{MC driven studies}
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{MC comparison}
-
- \begin{block}{Method 2: MC comparison}
-
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Simulate MC for:$\PB \to \PKstar \mu \mu$ PHSP, $\PB \to \PKstar \mu \mu$ SM and $\PB \to \PKstar \PJpsi$\\
- \item Using the same chain: Gauss $\to$ Boole $\to$ Moore
- \item The same files are run through two different Brunel versions (one for RECO12 other for RECO14).
- \item After this you have two sets of dsts that are easy to compare.
- \end{itemize}
- % {~}{~}Need to some how disentangle where the difference comes from.
- \end{block}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{0.1in}{~}
- \column{2.1in}
- \begin{exampleblock}{Advantages}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Clean way to compare(no backgrounds).
- \item Can check every step.
- \item No alignment of events problem.
-
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{exampleblock}
-
-
- \column{2.1in}
- \begin{alertblock}{Disadvantages}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Perfect detector alignment.
- \item DATA/MC difference.
- \item Need to repeat each step in 2011 analysis.
- \end{itemize}
- \end{alertblock}
-
- \end{columns}
-
-
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{MC Results $\PBzero \to \PKstar \PJpsi$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{0.in}{~}
-
- \column{2.3in}
- \begin{block}{MC}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.84\textwidth]{B0_VRTXCHI2.png}\\
- \includegraphics[width=0.84\textwidth]{B0_MM.png}
- \end{block}
- \column{0.in}{~}
-
- \column{2.3in}
- \begin{block}{DATA}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{VTX2.png}\\
- \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{mass.png}
-
- \end{block}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{MC Results $\PBzero \to \PKstar \PJpsi$ RECO}
- \begin{block}{Legend:}
- $RY = $~ RECO Y.\\ No selection just truth matching.
- \end{block}
- \begin{center}
- \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
- \hline
- Comparison(NEW vs OLD) & FOM & eff [\%] \\ \hline
- R14 vs R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD\|NEW)$ & 90.1 \\ \hline
- R14 vs R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD)$ & 95.0 \\ \hline
- R14 vs R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(NEW)$ & 94.6 \\ \hline
-
- \end{tabular}
- \end{center}
-
-
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{MC Results $\PBzero \to \PKstar \PJpsi$}
- \begin{block}{Legend:}
- $SXRY = $~ Stripping X, RECO Y.
- \end{block}
- \begin{center}
- \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
- \hline
- Comparison(NEW vs OLD) & FOM & eff [\%] \\ \hline
- S20R14 vs S17R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD\|NEW)$ & 81.1 \\ \hline
- S20R14 vs S17R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD)$ & 88.2 \\ \hline \hline
-
- S20R14 vs S17R14 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD\|NEW)$ & 94.7 \\ \hline
- S20R14 vs S17R14 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD)$ & 95.4 \\ \hline \hline
-
- S17R14 vs S17R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD\|NEW)$ & 84.5 \\ \hline
- S17R14 vs S17R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD)$ & 92.0 \\ \hline \hline
-
- S20R12 vs S17R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD\|NEW)$ & 90.0 \\ \hline
- S20R12 vs S17R12 & $ (OLD\&\&NEW)/(OLD)$ & 90.0 \\ \hline \hline
-
- \end{tabular}
- \end{center}
-
-
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Summary}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item The overlap in data is about 64\% when we have the BDT applied and the cuts aligned.
- \item The BDTs contain different variables and do not select the same events. The overlap for the old sample increases from 78 to 84\% when turning off the BDT in the new sample.
- \item Without any selection, the MC predicts an overlap of 95\%.
-
- \end{itemize}
-
-
- \end{frame}
- %\section{Conclusions \& plans}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{Mille viae ducunt homines per sacula solutio}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.90\textwidth]{Diagram1.png}
- \end{center}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item We are getting closer. We need to match $88\%$ (MC) with $83\%$ (DATA).
- \item To meet at common point we need to recover the old selection and BDT(work in progress).
- \item $p_T$ mystery remains to be solved.
- \item Applying an aligned selection (with no BDT), this comes down to 81\%. We know that there is not a complete correlation in e.g. IP $\chi^2$ between a track reconstructed in RECO 12 and 14, which explains this difference.
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \begin{frame}
- \frametitle{backups}
-
- \begin{Huge}
- Backup
- \end{Huge}
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PBzero$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_DIRA.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_FD.png}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_FDCHI2.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_IP.png}
- \end{columns}
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PBzero$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_IPCHI2.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_MM.png}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_P.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_PT.png}
- \end{columns}
-
- \end{frame}
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PBzero$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_tau.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_VRTXCHI2.png}
- \end{columns}
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PK$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/K_P.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/K_PT.png}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/K_TRK_CHI2.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- {~}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\Ppi$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Pi_P.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Pi_PT.png}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Pi_TRK_CHI2.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- {~}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\Pmuon$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mum_P.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mum_PT.png}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mum_TRK_CHI2.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- {~}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\APmuon$}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mup_P.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mup_PT.png}
- \end{columns}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mup_TRK_CHI2.png}
- \column{2.5in}
- {~}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \end{document}