Newer
Older
Presentations / tau23mu_lhcb / RD_Update / group_meeting.tex
@mchrzasz mchrzasz on 10 Oct 2013 18 KB update before changing laptops
  1. % This program can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms
  2. % of the GNU Public License, version 3.
  3. %
  4. % Seth Brown, Ph.D.
  5. % sethbrown@drbunsen.org
  6. %
  7. % Compiled with XeLaTeX
  8. % Dependencies:
  9. % Fontin Sans font (http://www.exljbris.com/fontinsans.fsrtml)
  10. %
  11. \documentclass{beamer}
  12. \usepackage{pgf}
  13. \usepackage{tikz}
  14. \usepackage{times}
  15. \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  16. %\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
  17. %\usepackage{mathptmx}
  18. %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
  19. \usepackage{hyperref}
  20. \usepackage{color}
  21. \usepackage{graphicx}
  22. \usepackage{wasysym}
  23. % \usepackage{pgfpagfes}
  24. % \setbeameroption{show notes on second screen}
  25. %\pgfpagesuselayout{4 on 1}[a4paper,border shrink=5mm,landscape]
  26. \usepackage{xcolor}
  27. \usepackage{xcolor,multirow}
  28.  
  29. %\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
  30. %\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}
  31. %\usepackage{amsfonts}
  32. %\usepackage{amsmath}
  33. % \usepackage[amssymb]{SIunits}
  34. %\usepackage{natbib}
  35. %\usepackage{amssymb}
  36. \usepackage{hepparticles}
  37. \usepackage{hepnicenames}
  38. \usepackage{hepunits}
  39. \usepackage{tikz}
  40. \usepackage[english]{babel}
  41. %%\usepackage{lmodern}
  42. %\usepackage{feynmp}
  43. % suppress navigation bar
  44. \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty
  45. \usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
  46. \usepackage{mathrsfs}
  47. \mode<presentation>
  48. {
  49. \usetheme{bunsen}
  50. \setbeamercovered{transparent}
  51. \setbeamertemplate{items}[circle]
  52. }
  53. \newcommand{\Simley}[1]{%
  54. \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.15]
  55. \newcommand*{\SmileyRadius}{1.0}%
  56. \draw [fill=brown!10] (0,0) circle (\SmileyRadius)% outside circle
  57. %node [yshift=-0.22*\SmileyRadius cm] {\tiny #1}% uncomment this to see the smile factor
  58. ;
  59.  
  60. \pgfmathsetmacro{\eyeX}{0.5*\SmileyRadius*cos(30)}
  61. \pgfmathsetmacro{\eyeY}{0.5*\SmileyRadius*sin(30)}
  62. \draw [fill=cyan,draw=none] (\eyeX,\eyeY) circle (0.15cm);
  63. \draw [fill=cyan,draw=none] (-\eyeX,\eyeY) circle (0.15cm);
  64.  
  65. \pgfmathsetmacro{\xScale}{2*\eyeX/180}
  66. \pgfmathsetmacro{\yScale}{1.0*\eyeY}
  67. \draw[color=red, domain=-\eyeX:\eyeX]
  68. plot ({\x},{
  69. -0.1+#1*0.15 % shift the smiley as smile decreases
  70. -#1*1.75*\yScale*(sin((\x+\eyeX)/\xScale))-\eyeY});
  71. \end{tikzpicture}%
  72. }%
  73. % set fonts
  74. \usepackage{amsfonts}
  75. \usepackage{amsmath}
  76. \usepackage{verbatim}
  77.  
  78. \usepackage{fancyvrb}
  79. \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{code}{Verbatim}{fontsize=\small}
  80. \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{example}{Verbatim}{fontsize=\small}
  81. \usepackage{listings}
  82. \usepackage{courier}
  83. \lstset{
  84. basicstyle=\footnotesize\ttfamily, % Standardschrift
  85. %numbers=left, % Ort der Zeilennummern
  86. numberstyle=\tiny, % Stil der Zeilennummern
  87. %stepnumber=2, % Abstand zwischen den Zeilennummern
  88. numbersep=5pt, % Abstand der Nummern zum Text
  89. tabsize=2, % Groesse von Tabs
  90. extendedchars=true, %
  91. breaklines=true, % Zeilen werden Umgebrochen
  92. keywordstyle=\color{red},
  93. frame=b,
  94. % keywordstyle=[1]\textbf, % Stil der Keywords
  95. % keywordstyle=[2]\textbf, %
  96. % keywordstyle=[3]\textbf, %
  97. % keywordstyle=[4]\textbf, \sqrt{\sqrt{}} %
  98. stringstyle=\color{white}\ttfamily, % Farbe der String
  99. showspaces=false, % Leerzeichen anzeigen ?
  100. showtabs=false, % Tabs anzeigen ?
  101. xleftmargin=17pt,
  102. framexleftmargin=17pt,
  103. framexrightmargin=5pt,
  104. framexbottommargin=4pt,
  105. %backgroundcolor=\color{lightgray},
  106. showstringspaces=false % Leerzeichen in Strings anzeigen ?
  107. }
  108.  
  109. %\DeclareCaptionFont{blue}{\color{blue}}
  110.  
  111. %\captionsetup[lstlisting]{singlelinecheck=false, labelfont={blue}, textfont={blue}}
  112. \usepackage{caption}
  113. \DeclareCaptionFont{white}{\color{white}}
  114. \DeclareCaptionFormat{listing}{\colorbox[cmyk]{0.43, 0.35, 0.35,0.01}{\parbox{\textwidth}{\hspace{15pt}#1#2#3}}}
  115. \captionsetup[lstlisting]{format=listing,labelfont=white,textfont=white, singlelinecheck=false, margin=0pt, font={bf,footnotesize}}
  116. \usetikzlibrary{arrows}
  117. \usetikzlibrary{shapes}
  118.  
  119. %\usepackage{gfsartemisia-euler}
  120. %\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  121. \setbeamerfont{frametitle}{size=\LARGE,series=\bfseries}
  122. \tikzstyle{decision} = [diamond, draw, fill=gray!20,
  123. text width=4.5em, text badly centered, node distance=3cm, inner sep=0pt]
  124. \tikzstyle{block} = [rectangle, draw, fill=blue!10,
  125. text width=5em, text centered, rounded corners, minimum height=2em]
  126. \tikzstyle{line} = [draw, -latex']
  127. \tikzstyle{cloud} = [draw, ellipse,fill=red!10, node distance=3cm,
  128. minimum height=2em]
  129.  
  130. \tikzstyle{every picture}+=[remember picture]
  131.  
  132.  
  133. \renewcommand{\PKs}{{\HepParticle{K}{S}{}\xspace}}
  134. % color definitions
  135. \usepackage{color}
  136. \definecolor{uipoppy}{RGB}{225, 64, 5}
  137. \definecolor{uipaleblue}{RGB}{96,123,139}
  138. \definecolor{uiblack}{RGB}{0, 0, 0}
  139.  
  140. % caption styling
  141. %\DeclareCaptionFont{uiblack}{\color{uiblack}}
  142. %\DeclareCaptionFont{uipoppy}{\color{uipoppy}}
  143. %\captionsetup{labelfont={uipoppy},textfont=uiblack}
  144.  
  145. % see the macros.tex file for definitions
  146. \include{macros }
  147.  
  148. % title slide definition
  149. \title{$\tau \to 3\mu$ Status Update}
  150. \author{Johannes Albrecht$^{1}$,Marta Calvi$^2$, \underline{Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz}$^{3,4}$, Jon Harrison$^{5}$, Basem Khanji$^{2}$, George Lafferty$^{5}$, Nicola Serra$^{3}$, Paul Seyfert$^6$}
  151. \institute[UZH, IFJ]
  152. {
  153. $^{1}$ Dortmund, $^{2}$ Milano, $^{3}$ Zurich, $^{4}$ Krakow,\\ $^{5}$ ManchesterManchester, $^{6}$ Heidelberg
  154. }
  155.  
  156.  
  157.  
  158.  
  159. \date{ \begin{small} $28^{th}$ August 2013 \end{small}}
  160.  
  161. %--------------------------------------------------------------------
  162. % Introduction
  163. %--------------------------------------------------------------------
  164.  
  165. \begin{document}
  166.  
  167.  
  168.  
  169.  
  170. \setbeamertemplate{background}
  171. {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{frontpage_bg_mine}}
  172. \setbeamertemplate{footline}[default]
  173.  
  174. \begin{frame}
  175. \vspace{1.1cm}
  176. \begin{columns}
  177. \column{2.75in}
  178. \titlepage
  179.  
  180. \begin{center}
  181. \includegraphics[height=1.0cm ]{pic/uzh.jpg}
  182. % \hspace{0.5cm}
  183. % \includegraphics[height=1.5cm]{pic/babar.jpg}
  184. \hspace{1cm}
  185. \includegraphics[height=1.0cm]{pic/ifj.png}
  186. \hspace{1cm}
  187. %\includegraphics[height=1.0cm]{pic/SNS.jpg}
  188. \end{center}
  189. \vspace{10cm}
  190. \column{2.0in}
  191. \end{columns}
  192. \end{frame}
  193.  
  194. %--------------------------------------------------------------------
  195. % OUTLINE
  196. %--------------------------------------------------------------------
  197.  
  198.  
  199.  
  200.  
  201. \section[Outline]{}
  202. \begin{frame}
  203. \tableofcontents
  204. \end{frame}
  205.  
  206.  
  207.  
  208.  
  209. %-------------------------------------------------------------------
  210. % Introduction
  211. %-------------------------------------------------------------------
  212. %
  213. % Set the background for the rest of the slides.
  214. % Insert infoline
  215. \setbeamertemplate{background}
  216. {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{slide_bg}}
  217. \setbeamertemplate{footline}[bunsentheme]
  218.  
  219. \title{Update on analysis}
  220.  
  221.  
  222. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  223. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  224.  
  225. \setbeamertemplate{background}
  226. {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{slide_bg}}
  227. \setbeamertemplate{footline}[bunsentheme]
  228. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%2>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  229. \section{Status}
  230. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Status}
  231. \begin{columns}
  232. \column{2in}
  233. \begin{center}
  234. $1 $fb$^{-1}$ analysis of \textcolor{violet}{$\tau \to \mu \mu \mu$} and \textcolor{blue}{$\tau \to p \mu \mu$} appeared in PLB.
  235.  
  236. \end{center}
  237.  
  238.  
  239. \column{3in}
  240.  
  241. \includegraphics[scale=0.197]{RD_meeting/PLB.png}
  242. \end{columns}
  243.  
  244. \begin{exampleblock}{2011 results:} \begin{enumerate}
  245. \item Obtained limit for $\tau \to \mu \mu \mu$: $8.0 \times 10^{-8}$.
  246. \item BaBar and Belle: $2.1 (3.2) \times 10^{-8}$ at $90\%$ CL.
  247. \item For 2012 + 2011 planned to implement several improvements.
  248.  
  249. \end{enumerate}
  250. \end{exampleblock}
  251.  
  252.  
  253. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  254.  
  255. \end{frame}
  256.  
  257. \section{MC Samples}
  258.  
  259. \begin{frame}\frametitle{MC Samples}
  260. \only<1>
  261. {
  262. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  263. \begin{enumerate}
  264. \item In 2011 analysis one of the biggest contributions to the systematic error from MC was the reweighting the MC signal for the correct cross section.
  265. \item For 2012 we solved this problem by simulating signal in 5 parts. One for each production channel(normalization to 1M events):
  266. \end{enumerate}
  267. \end{exampleblock}
  268. }
  269.  
  270. \begin{center}
  271.  
  272. \fcolorbox{blue}{yellow}{
  273. %\begin{equation}NUmber of ne
  274.  
  275. $\tau \to \mu \mu \mu = \begin{cases}
  276. \PB \to \Ptau \to \mu \mu \mu & 116,600 \\
  277. \PB \to \PDs \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 87,200\\
  278. \PB \to \PD \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 1,800\\
  279. \PDs \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 750,600\\
  280. \PD \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 43,800
  281.  
  282. \end{cases}$
  283. %\end{equation}
  284.  
  285. }
  286. % $\HepParticle{B}{}{\pm} \to \HepParticle{D}{}{(\ast)} \tau^{\pm} \nu$}
  287. \end{center}
  288.  
  289. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  290.  
  291. \end{frame}
  292. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
  293. \begin{frame}\frametitle{MC Generator Cuts}
  294. \only<1>
  295. {
  296. In order to reduce the number of unwanted events we introduced generator level cuts.
  297. \begin{center}
  298. \begin{tabular}{ | c | c || l | c |}
  299. \hline
  300. \multicolumn{2}{|c|| }{Signal sample\footnote{$X \to \tau\to 3\mu$, $\PDs \to \eta(\mu\mu \gamma) \mu \nu$, $\PDs \to \phi(\mu\mu) \pi$ }} & \multicolumn{2}{|c| }{Background sample(Dimuon)\footnote{$c\bar{c}$, $b\bar{b}$ }} \\ \hline \hline
  301. $p_{t\mu}$ & $>250MeV$ & $p_{t\mu}$ & $>280MeV$ \\ \hline
  302. $p_{\mu}$ & $>2.5GeV$ & $p_{\mu}$ & $>2.9GeV$ \\ \cline{3-4}
  303. & & $m(\mu\mu)$ & $<4.5GeV$\\ \cline{3-4}
  304. & & DOCA$(\mu\mu)$ & $<0.35mm$\\ \hline
  305. \end{tabular}
  306. \end{center}
  307. }
  308. Gain a factor of $\sim 8$ in statistics compared to 2011.
  309.  
  310. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  311.  
  312. \end{frame}
  313.  
  314.  
  315.  
  316. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
  317. \section{Normalization channel}
  318. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Normalization channel}
  319. \only<1>
  320. {
  321. As last year we will use \textcolor{blue}{$\PDs \to \phi(\mu\mu) \pi$}. Events are split into 2 categories:
  322. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  323. \begin{enumerate}
  324. \item $cc \to \PDs \to \phi (\mu\mu) \pi$ 897,000
  325. \item $bb \to \PDs \to \phi (\mu\mu) \pi$ 103,000
  326. \end{enumerate}
  327. \end{exampleblock}
  328. We avoid reweighting of the samples as in 2011.
  329. }
  330.  
  331. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  332.  
  333. \end{frame}
  334. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Mass correction}
  335. \only<1>
  336. {
  337. \begin{center}
  338. \begin{tiny}
  339. \begin{columns}
  340. \column{2.5in}
  341. \begin{center}
  342. $D_s \to \phi(\mu\mu)\pi$ in data.\\
  343. \includegraphics[scale=0.14]{Ds_Mass/Ds_mass_data.png} \\
  344. \begin{itemize}
  345. \item mean = $1970.3 \pm 0.9 MeV$
  346. \end{itemize}
  347. \end{center}
  348.  
  349. \column{2.5in}
  350. \begin{center}
  351. $D_s \to \phi(\mu\mu)\pi$ in MC.\\
  352. \includegraphics[scale=0.14]{Ds_Mass/D_mass_base.png}\\
  353. \begin{itemize}
  354. \item mean = $1969.1 \pm 0.60 MeV$
  355. \end{itemize}
  356. \end{center}
  357. \end{columns}
  358. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  359. \begin{columns}
  360. \column{2.5in}
  361. \begin{center}
  362. \begin{small}
  363. \begin{itemize}
  364. \item $m_{\tau \to 3\mu} = \dfrac{1970.3}{1969.1} \times 1777.7 =$\textcolor{blue}{$ 1778.8 \pm 1.1 MeV$}
  365. \end{itemize}
  366. {~} \\ In agreement with 2011.
  367. \end{small}
  368. \end{center}
  369.  
  370.  
  371. \column{2.5in}
  372. \begin{center}
  373. Fit $\tau \to \mu\mu\mu$ in MC. \\
  374. \includegraphics[scale=0.14]{Ds_Mass/tau_mass_base.png}\\
  375. \begin{itemize}
  376. \item mean = $1777.7 \pm 0.4 MeV$ \\
  377. \end{itemize}
  378. \end{center}
  379. \end{columns}
  380.  
  381. \end{tiny}
  382. \end{center}
  383.  
  384. }
  385.  
  386.  
  387.  
  388.  
  389. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  390.  
  391. \end{frame}
  392. \section{Peaking backgrounds}
  393. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Peaking backgrounds}
  394. \only<1>
  395. {
  396. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  397. \begin{enumerate}
  398. \item The dominant background source of peaking background in this analysis is \textcolor{blue}{$\PDs \to \eta(\mu\mu\gamma) \mu \nu$}\\
  399. \item In 2011 we suffered from lack of MC statistics.
  400. \item Thanks to generator cuts our pdfs became more stable.
  401. \end{enumerate}
  402. \end{exampleblock}
  403.  
  404. \begin{columns}
  405. \column{2.5in}
  406. \begin{center}
  407.  
  408. \includegraphics[scale=0.11]{RD_meeting/pid_0_65_0_725geo-0_48_0_05.png} \\
  409. \begin{tiny} PID:$0.65;0.725$,GEO:$-0.48;0.05$ \end{tiny}
  410. \end{center}
  411.  
  412. \column{2.5in}
  413. \begin{center}
  414. \includegraphics[scale=0.11]{RD_meeting/pid_0_725_0_86geo0_35_0_65.png}\\
  415. \begin{tiny} PID:$0.725;0.0.86$,GEO:$0.35;0.65$ \end{tiny}
  416.  
  417. \end{center}
  418. \end{columns}
  419. }
  420.  
  421. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  422.  
  423. \end{frame}
  424. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  425.  
  426. \section{Normalization}
  427. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Normalization}
  428. \only<1>
  429. {
  430. For the normalization of background samples($c\bar{c}$ and $b\bar{b}$) we used generator cuts efficiencies and corrected the nominal cross section accordingly:\\
  431. \begin{center}
  432. $\mathcal{L} = \dfrac{N_{MC}}{\varepsilon_{acc} \times \varepsilon_{gen} \times \sigma{LHCb}}$
  433. \end{center}
  434. The obtained luminosities(per 1M events):
  435. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  436. \begin{enumerate}
  437. \item $\mathcal{L}_{cc} = 0.25 \pm 0.04 pb^{-1}$
  438. \item $\mathcal{L}_{bb} = 1.20 \pm 0.15 pb^{-1}$
  439. \end{enumerate}
  440. \end{exampleblock}
  441. }
  442. Dominant uncertainty from the cross section.
  443.  
  444.  
  445. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  446.  
  447. \end{frame}
  448.  
  449.  
  450.  
  451.  
  452. \section{Isolating parameter}
  453. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Isolating parameters}
  454. {~}
  455.  
  456.  
  457. \only<1>
  458. {
  459. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  460. \begin{enumerate}
  461.  
  462. \item In 2011 we used the isolation parameter developed for $\PBs \to \mu\mu$. For 2012 data we optimised the isolation parameter for our channel based on MVA(BDT).
  463. \item Instead of training on isolating vs non-isoalting tracks we train on combinatorial background vs signal.
  464. \item We see big improvement compared to old isolation.
  465. \end{enumerate}
  466. \end{exampleblock}
  467. }
  468. \begin{columns}
  469. \column{2.5in}
  470. \begin{center}
  471.  
  472. \includegraphics[scale=0.18]{RD_meeting/mva_BDT.png} \\
  473.  
  474. \end{center}
  475.  
  476. \column{2.5in}
  477. \begin{center}
  478. \includegraphics[scale=0.17]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS.png}\\
  479.  
  480. \end{center}
  481. \end{columns}
  482.  
  483.  
  484. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  485.  
  486. \end{frame}
  487.  
  488.  
  489. \section{Ensemble Selection}
  490. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Ensemble Selection}
  491. {~}
  492. \only<1>
  493. {
  494. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  495. \begin{enumerate}
  496. \item In the last few years people winning leading machine learning contests started to combine their classifiers to squeeze the best out of them.
  497. \item This technique/method is know as Ensemble Selection or Blending.
  498. \item The plan for $\tau \to \mu \mu \mu$ is to take it to the next level.
  499. \item Combine not only different channels, but also different $\tau$ sources(slide 4).
  500. \end{enumerate}
  501. \end{exampleblock}
  502. }
  503. \only<2>
  504. {
  505.  
  506. \begin{columns}
  507. \column{2.5in}
  508. \begin{center}
  509. \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_21513000.png}\\
  510. \begin{itemize}
  511. \item $\PB \to \PD \to \tau$
  512. \end{itemize}
  513. \end{center}
  514.  
  515. \column{2.5in}
  516. \begin{center}
  517. \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_21513001.png}\\
  518. \begin{itemize}
  519. \item $\PD \to \tau$
  520. \end{itemize}
  521. \end{center}
  522. \end{columns}
  523. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  524. \begin{columns}
  525. \column{2.5in}
  526. \begin{center}
  527. \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_23513000.png}\\
  528. \begin{itemize}
  529. \item $\PB \to \PDs \to \tau$
  530. \end{itemize}
  531. \end{center}
  532.  
  533.  
  534. \column{2.5in}
  535. \begin{center}
  536. \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_23513001.png}\\
  537. \begin{itemize}
  538. \item $\PDs \to \tau$
  539. \end{itemize}
  540. \end{center}
  541. \end{columns}
  542.  
  543.  
  544. }
  545.  
  546. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz, N.Serra 2013}
  547.  
  548. \end{frame}
  549.  
  550. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5555
  551. \section{Binning optimisation}
  552.  
  553. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Binning optimisation}
  554. {~}
  555. \only<1>
  556. {
  557. For the 2011 analysis we had two classifiers: $PIDNN$ and $M_{GEO}$. Each of them we optimised separately. For the 2012 analysis we are performing a simultaneous 2D optimisation.
  558.  
  559. \begin{columns}
  560. \column{2.5in}
  561.  
  562.  
  563. \includegraphics[scale=0.13]{inflaton/punzi1.png}
  564. \column{2.5in}
  565. \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{RD_meeting/2d-data.pdf}
  566.  
  567. \end{columns}
  568. }
  569.  
  570. \end{frame}
  571. \section{Conclusions}
  572.  
  573. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Conclusions}
  574. {~}
  575. \only<1>
  576. {
  577. \begin{exampleblock}{~}
  578. \begin{enumerate}
  579. \item Analysis is well underway.
  580. \item MC samples are almost there.
  581. \item Hope to improve the selection.
  582. \item $\tau \to p \mu \mu$ mode will be studied in parallel.
  583. \end{enumerate}
  584. \end{exampleblock}
  585. }
  586. \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{RD_meeting/phd052805.png}\\
  587.  
  588.  
  589.  
  590. \end{frame}
  591. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  592.  
  593. \begin{frame}
  594. {~}
  595. \begin{Huge}
  596. BACKUP
  597. \end{Huge}
  598.  
  599.  
  600. \end{frame}
  601.  
  602.  
  603. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
  604.  
  605. \begin{frame}\frametitle{$B \to \tau$}
  606. {~}\\
  607. We really suck in selecting this channel.
  608.  
  609. \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_31113002.png}
  610.  
  611.  
  612.  
  613. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  614. \end{frame}
  615.  
  616. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  617. \begin{frame}\frametitle{$B \to D_s \to \tau$}
  618. {~}\\
  619. On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
  620.  
  621.  
  622. \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_23513000.png}
  623.  
  624.  
  625.  
  626. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  627. \end{frame}
  628.  
  629. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  630. \begin{frame}\frametitle{$D_s \to \tau$}
  631. {~}\\
  632. On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
  633.  
  634.  
  635. \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_23513001.png}
  636.  
  637.  
  638.  
  639. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  640. \end{frame}
  641.  
  642. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  643. \begin{frame}\frametitle{$B \to D^+ \to \tau$}
  644. {~}\\
  645. On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
  646.  
  647.  
  648. \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/21513000_roc2.png}
  649.  
  650.  
  651.  
  652. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  653. \end{frame}
  654.  
  655. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  656. \begin{frame}\frametitle{$D^+ \to \tau$}
  657. {~}\\
  658. On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
  659.  
  660.  
  661. \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_21513001.png}
  662.  
  663.  
  664.  
  665. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  666. \end{frame}
  667.  
  668. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  669.  
  670. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Comparison on mix sample}
  671. {~}\\
  672. On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
  673.  
  674.  
  675. \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/mix.png}
  676.  
  677.  
  678.  
  679. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  680. \end{frame}
  681.  
  682. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  683. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Conclusions on TMVA}
  684. {~}\\
  685. \begin{itemize}
  686. \item Each of the signal components is enormously larger than MVA trained on mix.
  687. \item Method looks very promising if we can find a nice blending method(work for next week).
  688. \item Mayby discusion on TMVA/MatrixNet/Neurobayes is next to leading order effect compared to this method?
  689.  
  690.  
  691. \end{itemize}
  692.  
  693.  
  694. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  695. \end{frame}
  696. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
  697. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Comparison on mix sample}
  698. {~}\\
  699. \begin{columns}
  700. \column{2.5in}
  701.  
  702.  
  703. \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_oryginal.png}
  704. \column{2.5in}
  705. \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_blend.png}
  706.  
  707. \end{columns}
  708.  
  709.  
  710. \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
  711. \end{frame}
  712.  
  713.  
  714.  
  715. \end{document}