\documentclass[]{beamer}
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
\usepackage{beamerthemesplit}
\useoutertheme{infolines}
\usecolortheme{dolphin}
\usetheme{Warsaw}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{latexsym}
\usepackage{hyperref}
 
 
%\usetheme{Boadilla}
 
%\beamersetuncovermixins{\opaqueness<1>{25}}{\opaqueness<2->{15}}
\title{$Ds \rightarrow \eta \mu \nu$}  
\author{Marcin Chrzaszcz}
 
\date{\today} 
 
\begin{document}
 
{
\institute{Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN}
\setbeamertemplate{footline}{} 
\begin{frame}
  \titlepage
\end{frame}
}
 
\institute{IFJ PAN}
 
 
 
%tutaj mamy pierwsza strone
 
 
\section[Outline]{}
\begin{frame}
\tableofcontents
\end{frame}
 
%normal slides
\begin{frame}\frametitle{}
Geo efficiency in new model staided the same:
$eff =  0.183 +/ 0.010 $
 
This is from 900k events.
Waiting for gibbef background sample to give better fits.
 
For our standard bins there were to fiew events to performe a realible fit(see the zip file)
New bins:
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|c|c|}
\hline
\textbf{PID} & \textbf{Geo} \\
\hline
$-0.03 $ &  $-1.0 $ \\
\hline
$0.03 $ &   $0.44 $ \\
\hline
$1 $ &  $1.0 $ \\
\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
 
\end{frame}
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{CUTS}
 
I used standard cuts:
\begin{itemize}
\item $mass(p0p1)>250MeV $
\item $abs(mass(p0p2-1020 MeV))>20MeV$
\item $abs(mass(p1p2-1020 MeV))>20MeV$
\end{itemize}
$\tau$ mass cut:
\begin{itemize}
\item $mass(\tau) \in (1600-1950) MeV $
\end{itemize}
 
\end{frame}
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{ONE BIN}
 
\includegraphics[scale=0.46]{all.png}
 
 
\end{frame}
 
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{FITS}
 
 
\begin{columns}[c]
	\column{2.5in}
	\includegraphics[scale=0.22]{pid_0p03_1geo0p44_1.png}
\newline	$Pid\in(0.03,1)$, $Geo\in(0.44,1)$
\column{2.5in}
	\includegraphics[scale=0.22]{2.png}
\newline	$Pid\in(0.03,1)$, $Geo\in(-1.0,0.44)$
 
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{FITS}
 
 
\begin{columns}[c]
	\column{2.5in}
	\includegraphics[scale=0.22]{pid_-0p03_0p03geo0p44_1.png}
\newline	$Pid\in(-0.03,0.03)$, $Geo\in(0.44,1)$
\column{2.5in}
	\includegraphics[scale=0.22]{1.png}
\newline	$Pid\in(-0.03,0.03)$, $Geo\in(-1.0,0.44)$
 
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Why is 4 bins enought}
 
\includegraphics[scale=0.23]{4in1.png}
 
In the relewant mass region very small differance.
 
\end{frame}
 
 
\end{document}