% This program can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms
% of the GNU Public License, version 3.
%
% Seth Brown, Ph.D.
% sethbrown@drbunsen.org
%
% Compiled with XeLaTeX
% Dependencies:
%   Fontin Sans font (http://www.exljbris.com/fontinsans.html)
%
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage{pgf}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
%\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
%\usepackage{mathptmx}
%\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\usepackage{hyperref}
% \usepackage{pgfpagfes}
% \setbeameroption{show notes on second screen}
%\pgfpagesuselayout{4 on 1}[a4paper,border shrink=5mm,landscape]
\usepackage{xcolor}
%\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}
%\usepackage{amsfonts}
%\usepackage{amsmath}
% \usepackage[amssymb]{SIunits}
%\usepackage{natbib}
%\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{hepparticles}
\usepackage{hepnicenames}
\usepackage{hepunits}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage[polish]{babel}
%\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{feynmp}
% suppress navigation bar
\beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty
\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\mode<presentation>
{
  \usetheme{bunsen}
  \setbeamercovered{transparent}
  \setbeamertemplate{items}[circle]
}
 
% set fonts
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{eepic}
\usetikzlibrary{arrows}
\usetikzlibrary{shapes}
 
%\usepackage{gfsartemisia-euler}
%\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\setbeamerfont{frametitle}{size=\LARGE,series=\bfseries}
\tikzstyle{decision} = [diamond, draw, fill=gray!20, 
    text width=4.5em, text badly centered, node distance=3cm, inner sep=0pt]
\tikzstyle{block} = [rectangle, draw, fill=blue!10, 
    text width=5em, text centered, rounded corners, minimum height=2em]
\tikzstyle{line} = [draw, -latex']
\tikzstyle{cloud} = [draw, ellipse,fill=red!10, node distance=3cm,
    minimum height=2em]
 
\tikzstyle{every picture}+=[remember picture]
 
 
\renewcommand{\PKs}{{\HepParticle{K}{S}{}\xspace}}
% color definitions
\usepackage{color}
\definecolor{uipoppy}{RGB}{225, 64, 5}
\definecolor{uipaleblue}{RGB}{96,123,139}
\definecolor{uiblack}{RGB}{0, 0, 0}
 
% see the macros.tex file for definitions
\include{macros}
 
% title slide definition
\title{ $\tau$ Physics at $\tau$ - $c$ factory }
\author{Alberto Lusiani, Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz}
\institute[SNS, INFN, IFJ]
 
 
 
\date{30th November 2012}
 
%--------------------------------------------------------------------
%                           Introduction
%--------------------------------------------------------------------
 
\begin{document}
 
 
\setbeamertemplate{background}
{\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{frontpage_bg_mine}}
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[default]
 
\begin{frame}
\vspace{1.1cm}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.75in}
  \titlepage
 
  \begin{center}
    \includegraphics[height=1.5cm,keepaspectratio ]{pic/SNS.png}
   \hspace{1cm}
   \includegraphics[height=1.5cm]{pic/INFN.png}
      \hspace{1cm}
   \includegraphics[height=1.4cm]{pic/ifj.png}
   \end{center}
  \vspace{10cm}
\column{2.0in}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}
 
 
 
 
 
\section[Outline]{}
\begin{frame}
\tableofcontents
\end{frame}
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
%-------------------------------------------------------------------
%                          Section 1
%-------------------------------------------------------------------
%
% Set the background for the rest of the slides.
% Insert infoline
\setbeamertemplate{background}
 {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{slide_bg}}
\setbeamertemplate{footline}[bunsentheme]
 
 
\section{$\Upsilon(4S)$ vs $\Psi(3770)$ in $\tau$ sector}
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{$\Upsilon(4S)$ vs $\Psi(3770)$ in $\tau$ sector}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.2in}
\only<1>{
\begin{block}{}
        \circled{1} $\tau \overline{\tau}$ cross section
        	\begin{itemize}
        	\item  $\sigma_{\tau \overline{\tau}}(m_{\tau \overline{\tau}})=0.1 nb$
        	\item  $\sigma_{\tau \overline{\tau}}(\Upsilon(4S))=0.9 nb$
        	\item  $\sigma_{\tau \overline{\tau}}(\Upsilon(2S))=2.5 nb$
        	\item  	 $\sigma_{\tau \overline{\tau} MAX}(4.25 \GeV)=3.5 nb$
        	\end{itemize}
      \hspace{1cm} 
       	 \colorbox{white}{\color{blue}   $\sigma_{\tau \overline{\tau}}=\dfrac{4 \Pi \alpha^{2}}{3s} \dfrac{3\beta -\beta^{2}}{2}$,} 
 \hspace{1cm}
 		{\newline	 $\beta$ velocity of $\tau$  }
                  
    \end{block}
    }
 \only<2>{
\begin{block}{}
        \circled{2} SuperB $75 ab^{-1}$:
        	\begin{itemize}
        	\item  Number of $\tau \overline{\tau}$ produced:
        	$0.9nb \times 75 ab^{-1} = 6.8 \times 10^{10}$
        	
        	\end{itemize}
        	 \circled{3} $\tau - c$ factory $7.5 ab^{-1} $:
        	 
        	\begin{itemize}
        	\item  Number of $\tau \overline{\tau}$ produced:
	          $3 \times 7.5 ab^{-1} = 2.3 \times 10^{10}$	
        	
        	\end{itemize}
                  
    \end{block}
    }   
    
    
    
\column{3.25in}
\only<1>{
\includegraphics[scale=0.32 ]{pic/tau_cross.png}
}
 
  
 \only<2>{
\includegraphics[scale=0.22 ]{pic/tau_cross2.png}
}
\end{columns}
  
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
 
 
 
 
 
\section{Lepton Flavour Violation(LFV)}
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Current Status of LFV}
 
\begin{block}{}
        \circled{1} Theoretical considerations:
        	\begin{itemize}
        	\item LFV predicted in many NP models(SUSY, Majorana neutrinos).
        	\item In SM negligibly small $\mathcal{B}<10^{-54}$  \footnote{T.P Cheng, L.Li, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45 (1980) 1908}.
        	\item Any observation clear sign of NP.
        	\end{itemize}	
        \circled{2} Experimental status:   
       	   	\begin{itemize}
        	\item Limits for LFV channels set by BaBar, Belle and Cleo in range of $10^{-7} - 10^{-8}$ depending on the decay channel.
        	\item Most promising channels: $\tau \to \mu \gamma$ and $\tau \to 3 \mu$.
        	\end{itemize}	  
                  
    \end{block}
 
 
 
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
\subsection{$\tau \to \mu \gamma$ at $\tau -c$ factory }
\begin{frame}\frametitle{$\tau \to \mu \gamma$  at $\tau -c$ factory }
SM background for $\tau \to \mu \gamma$ :
\begin{itemize}
\item $\tau \to \mu \gamma \nu_{\mu} \nu_{\tau}$
\item $\tau \to \pi \pi^{0} \nu_{\tau}$
\item $\tau\tau \to \mu  \nu_{\mu} \nu_{\tau} + \pi \pi^{0} \nu_{\tau} \to \mu \gamma \pi^{+}\gamma \mu_{\nu} \nu_{\tau}\nu_{\overline{\tau}}$
\item Initial state radiation: $e^{+} e^{-} \to \tau \overline{\tau} \gamma$
\item Initial state radiation: $e^{+} e^{-} \to \mu \overline{\mu} \gamma$
\end{itemize}
ISR strongly suppress the the sensitivity in $\mathcal{B}$ factories.
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Suppression ISR at charm threshold}
\begin{columns}
\column{0.3in}
\column{0.8in}
 
\color{red}{$E_{\gamma}$ FSR}
 
 
\hspace{1cm}   \color{black}{$E_{\gamma} \tau \to \mu \gamma$}
\\
ISR vanishes for $E \approx 4 GeV $
 
\column{4.5in}
 
 
 
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.2 ]{pic/ISF.png}
\end{center}
 
\end{columns}
 
 
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
 
 
 
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Expected sensitivity for $\tau \to \mu \gamma$}
 
From MC studies \footnote{A.V. Bobrov, A.E Boundar, arxiv: 1206.1909} one can estimate the background in the $\mathcal{c} - \tau$ factory using KK2F with TAUOLA generator.
\begin{center}
\includegraphics[scale=0.18 ]{pic/idiots.png}
\end{center}
A full data set of $7.5 ab^{-1}$ is sufficient to put an exclusion limit on  $\tau \to \mu \gamma$ of order of $10^{-9}$.
 
 
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
 
\section{QCD probe}
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Probe QCD}
 
\begin{itemize}
\item Using analytical constraints and the Operator Product Expansion one can compute ration between harmonic and leptonic decays:
\newline $R_{\tau} \equiv \dfrac{\Gamma( \tau \to \nu hadrons(\gamma)) }{\Gamma( \tau \to e \nu_{\tau} \nu_{e})} = R_{\tau, V} + R_{\tau, A}+ R_{\tau, S}$
\item Which can be further devided to contributions coming form different quarks and currents:
$R_{\tau} \equiv \dfrac{\Gamma( \tau \to \nu hadrons(\gamma)) }{\Gamma( \tau \to e \nu_{\tau} \nu_{e})} =  R_{\tau, V} + R_{\tau, A}+ R_{\tau, S}$
\item Theoretical prediction can be wrote in a form:
$R_{\tau, V+A}=N_{c} \vert V_{ud} \vert^{2} S_{EW}(1+\delta_{P}+\delta_{NP})$ \footnote{W.A. Rolke and A.M. Lopez, Nucl. Instr. Meth. in Phys. Res. A458, 745 (2001).}
\item Biggest correction comes from $\delta_{P}$.
 
 
\end{itemize}
 
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
 
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
\section{CP Violation}
\begin{frame}\frametitle{CP Violation}
\begin{itemize}
\item CP violation in $\tau$ sector is becoming a popular subject in light that the CKM matrix cannot explain matter-antimatter asymmetry.
\item Much more decay modes than in $\mu$ sector.
\item Possible contributions from charge Higgs at loop level.
\end{itemize}
The most promising channel is: $\tau \to K_{s} \pi \nu$
\begin{enumerate}
\item SM in 3rd loops generates asymmetry.
\item Numerical studies showed that NP can contribute in $1\%$
\item Expected sensitivity with full data set is expected to be of the order of  $0.01\%$
 
\end{enumerate} 
 
 
 
 
  \textref{A.Lusiani, M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2012}
\end{frame}
 
 
 
 
\end{document}