Newer
Older
Presentations / tau23mu_lhcb / Updates_from_krakow / expl.tex
@mchrzasz mchrzasz on 9 Jan 2013 7 KB first commit
  1. \documentclass[]{beamer}
  2. \setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
  3. \usepackage{beamerthemesplit}
  4. \useoutertheme{infolines}
  5. \usecolortheme{dolphin}
  6. \usetheme{Warsaw}
  7. \usepackage{graphicx}
  8. \usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
  9. \usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
  10. \usepackage{amsmath}
  11. \usepackage{amsfonts}
  12. \usepackage{amssymb}
  13. \usepackage{latexsym}
  14. \usepackage{hyperref}
  15.  
  16.  
  17. %\usetheme{Boadilla}
  18.  
  19. %\beamersetuncovermixins{\opaqueness<1>{25}}{\opaqueness<2->{15}}
  20. \title{Updates from Krakow}
  21. \author{Marcin Chrzaszcz}
  22.  
  23. \date{\today}
  24.  
  25. \begin{document}
  26.  
  27. {
  28. \institute{Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN}
  29. \setbeamertemplate{footline}{}
  30. \begin{frame}
  31. \titlepage
  32. \end{frame}
  33. }
  34.  
  35. \institute{IFJ PAN}
  36.  
  37.  
  38.  
  39. %tutaj mamy pierwsza strone
  40.  
  41.  
  42. \section[Outline]{}
  43. \begin{frame}
  44. \tableofcontents
  45. \end{frame}
  46.  
  47. %normal slides
  48. \begin{frame}\frametitle{FITS}
  49.  
  50. Marc sugestions:
  51. \begin{enumerate}
  52. \item Check with different strategies
  53. ( RooFit::Strategy(4), etc.)
  54. \item Change the mass window and see what happens.
  55. Mark said that if the fit will still be rising you have to prove, by changing the window get the rising fit and compare the expected number of events. If they don't change much it's ok.
  56. \end{enumerate}
  57. \end{frame}
  58.  
  59. \begin{frame}\frametitle{1st Point}
  60.  
  61. I checked all possible strategies, with different ranges(even 100 times to big). The fit is stable as hell =)
  62. \end{frame}
  63.  
  64. \begin{frame}\frametitle{FITS}
  65.  
  66.  
  67. \begin{columns}[c]
  68. \newline
  69. \column{3.5in}
  70. \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{160_195.png}
  71. \column{1.5in}
  72. \begin{block}{Standard fit}
  73. Not changed mass window
  74. \end{block}
  75. \end{columns}
  76. \end{frame}
  77.  
  78.  
  79. \begin{frame}\frametitle{FITS}
  80.  
  81.  
  82.  
  83.  
  84.  
  85. \begin{columns}[c]
  86. \newline
  87. \column{3.5in}
  88. \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{b.png}
  89. \column{1.5in}
  90. \begin{block}{Different mass window}
  91. Throwing away only one marked point gives flat distribution.
  92.  
  93. \end{block}
  94. \end{columns}
  95. \end{frame}
  96.  
  97.  
  98.  
  99. \begin{frame}
  100. \begin{columns}[c]
  101. \newline
  102. \column{3.5in}
  103. \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{a.png}
  104. \column{1.5in}
  105. \begin{block}{Different mass window}
  106. Throwing away more point gives us droping distributions.
  107.  
  108. \end{block}
  109. \end{columns}
  110. \end{frame}
  111.  
  112.  
  113.  
  114.  
  115.  
  116.  
  117.  
  118.  
  119.  
  120. \begin{frame}\frametitle{FITS}
  121. \begin{columns}[c]
  122. \newline
  123. \column{3.5in}
  124. \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{pm80.png}
  125. \column{1.5in}
  126. \begin{block}{Different mass window}
  127. $80MeV$ Mass window.
  128. \end{block}
  129. \end{columns}
  130. \end{frame}
  131.  
  132.  
  133. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Summary}
  134. \begin{enumerate}
  135. \item I tested this in every way I could.
  136. \item Consulted with coleagues that are doing fits all the time(they didn't find any mistake).
  137. \item The most important: Different mass ranges change the expected number of backgrounds eventes arround $5\%$ so it's not relewant.
  138. \end{enumerate}
  139. \end{frame}
  140. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Updates on the numbers}
  141.  
  142. I changed the range the from which I extrapolate the number of backgorund from the same region $(1650,1900)\setminus(1743,1803)MeV$
  143.  
  144. \begin{scriptsize}
  145.  
  146. \begin{center}
  147. \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
  148. \hline
  149. \textbf{PID} & \textbf{GL} & \textbf{Linear} & \textbf{Error lin } & \textbf{EXP} & \textbf{Error. Exp}\\
  150.  
  151. \hline
  152. %$ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ -1.0 , 0.116 $ & $225.286975$ & $3.720377$ & $214.762667$ & $6.453331$ \\
  153. $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ -1.00 , 0.116 $ & $223.681440$ & $4.285854$ & $215.951131$ & $4.703320$ \\
  154. \hline
  155. % $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $25.334704$ & $0.730938$ & $22.658613$ & $3.382960$ \\
  156. $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $22.170251$ & $0.770944$ & $20.381995$ & $2.351677$ \\
  157. \hline
  158. % $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.44 , 0.616 $ & $6.315243$ & $0.557466$ & $6.259470$ & $0.429338$ \\
  159. $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.44 , 0.616 $ & $6.432532$ & $0.685642$ & $6.389303$ & $0.297094$ \\
  160. \hline
  161. $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $1.863888$ & $0.980816$ & $1.379745$ & $0.967495$ \\
  162. %$ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $2.101699$ & $0.879121$ & $1.433717$ & $1.249549$ \\
  163. \hline
  164. %$ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ -1.0, 0.116 $ & $113.445685$ & $3.673353$ & $108.791320$ & $-3.605409$ \
  165. $ 0.07, 1.0 $ & $ -1.0 , 0.116 $ & $112.765871$ & $3.022240$ & $106.582612$ & $4.852854$ \\
  166. \hline
  167. % $ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $15.177247$ & $0.424522$ & $10.128789$ & $3.232027$ \\
  168. $ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $13.728065$ & $0.462664$ & $10.022689$ & $2.584259$ \\
  169. \hline
  170. %$ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.440 , 0.616 $ & $4.828111$ & $0.422406$ & $4.066456$ & $1.435559$ \\
  171. $ 0.07 , 1.0$ & $ 0.440, 0.616 $ & $6.042397$ & $0.299367$ & $5.315554$ & $1.423532$ \\
  172. \hline
  173. % $ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $3.871274$ & $1.701825$ & $3.372127$ & $1.346100$ \\
  174. $ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $3.691082$ & $1.955345$ & $3.329173$ & $1.026430$ \\
  175. \hline
  176.  
  177.  
  178.  
  179. \end{tabular}
  180. \end{center}
  181. \end{scriptsize}
  182. \end{frame}
  183. \begin{frame}\frametitle{Updates on the numbers}
  184.  
  185. \begin{scriptsize}
  186.  
  187. \begin{center}
  188. \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
  189. \hline
  190. \textbf{PID} & \textbf{GL} & \textbf{Linear} & \textbf{Error lin } & \textbf{EXP} & \textbf{Error. Exp}\\
  191.  
  192. \hline
  193. %$ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ -1.0 , 0.116 $ & $225.286975$ & $3.720377$ & $214.762667$ & $6.453331$ \\
  194. $ -0.03 , -0.005 $ & $ -1.0 , 0.116 $ & $612.515740$ & $5.517984$ & $608.152648$ & $3.209168$ \\
  195. \hline
  196. % $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $25.334704$ & $0.730938$ & $22.658613$ & $3.382960$ \\
  197. $ -0.03 , -0.005 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $48.887154$ & $2.455029$ & $48.605891$ & $1.225935$ \\
  198. \hline
  199. % $ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.44 , 0.616 $ & $6.315243$ & $0.557466$ & $6.259470$ & $0.429338$ \\
  200. $ -0.03 , -0.005 $ & $ 0.44 , 0.616 $ & $12.568007$ & $0.880412$ & $10.282640$ & $2.259703$ \\
  201. \hline
  202. $ -0.03 , -0.005 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $4.898097$ & $1.134637$ & $2.879837$ & $1.518258$ \\
  203. %$ 0.03 , 0.07 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $2.101699$ & $0.879121$ & $1.433717$ & $1.249549$ \\
  204. \hline
  205. %$ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ -1.0, 0.116 $ & $113.445685$ & $3.673353$ & $108.791320$ & $-3.605409$ \
  206. $ -0.005 , 0.03 $ & $ -1.0 , 0.116 $ & $388.613829$ & $4.015244$ & $385.164540$ & $3.033609$ \\
  207. \hline
  208. % $ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $15.177247$ & $0.424522$ & $10.128789$ & $3.232027$ \\
  209. $ -0.005 , 0.03 $ & $ 0.116 , 0.44 $ & $37.193932$ & $0.995706$ & $32.771010$ & $3.456820$ \\
  210. \hline
  211. %$ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.440 , 0.616 $ & $4.828111$ & $0.422406$ & $4.066456$ & $1.435559$ \\
  212. $ -0.005 , 0.03 $ & $ 0.44 , 0.616 $ & $8.976528$ & $0.847767$ & $8.533797$ & $1.034161$ \\
  213. \hline
  214. % $ 0.07 , 1.0 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $3.871274$ & $1.701825$ & $3.372127$ & $1.346100$ \\
  215. $ -0.005 , 0.03 $ & $ 0.616 , 1.0 $ & $5.757810$ & $0.896886$ & $5.176158$ & $1.295585$ \\
  216. \hline
  217.  
  218.  
  219.  
  220. \end{tabular}
  221. \end{center}
  222. \end{scriptsize}
  223. \end{frame}
  224. \begin{frame}\frametitle{EvtGen model, without Geant}
  225.  
  226.  
  227. \includegraphics[scale=0.35]{old_new.png}
  228. Looks much better. On on "eye test" it very similar to the one found in Martas Paper.
  229. \end{frame}
  230. \begin{frame}\frametitle{News about the production}
  231.  
  232. \begin{enumerate}
  233. \item Produced more than 400k events.
  234. \item Started working on ntuples. Many thanks for Pauls help with software.
  235. \item Due to limited disk space it would be good to decide soon how many events we want.
  236. \end{enumerate}
  237. I also started working on the binning. I should have something to show on next meeting.
  238. \end{frame}
  239.  
  240.  
  241.  
  242.  
  243.  
  244.  
  245.  
  246.  
  247. \end{document}