- \documentclass[11 pt,xcolor={dvipsnames,svgnames,x11names,table}]{beamer}
-
- \usepackage[english]{babel}
- \usepackage{polski}
-
-
- \usetheme[
- bullet=circle, % Other option: square
- bigpagenumber, % circled page number on lower right
- topline=true, % colored bar at the top of the frame
- shadow=false, % Shading for beamer blocks
- watermark=BG_lower, % png file for the watermark
- ]{Flip}
-
- %\logo{\kern+1.em\includegraphics[height=1cm]{SHiP-3_LightCharcoal}}
-
-
- \usepackage[lf]{berenis}
- \usepackage[LY1]{fontenc}
- \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
-
- \usepackage{emerald}
- \usefonttheme{professionalfonts}
- \usepackage[no-math]{fontspec}
- \defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text} % This seems to be important for mapping glyphs properly
-
- \setmainfont{Gillius ADF} % Beamer ignores "main font" in favor of sans font
- \setsansfont{Gillius ADF} % This is the font that beamer will use by default
- % \setmainfont{Gill Sans Light} % Prettier, but harder to read
-
- \setbeamerfont{title}{family=\fontspec{Gillius ADF}}
-
- \input t1augie.fd
-
- %\newcommand{\handwriting}{\fontspec{augie}} % From Emerald City, free font
- %\newcommand{\handwriting}{\usefont{T1}{fau}{m}{n}} % From Emerald City, free font
- % \newcommand{\handwriting}{} % If you prefer no special handwriting font or don't have augie
-
- %% Gill Sans doesn't look very nice when boldfaced
- %% This is a hack to use Helvetica instead
- %% Usage: \textbf{\forbold some stuff}
- %\newcommand{\forbold}{\fontspec{Arial}}
-
- \usepackage{graphicx}
- \usepackage[export]{adjustbox}
-
- \usepackage{amsmath}
- \usepackage{amsfonts}
- \usepackage{amssymb}
- \usepackage{bm}
- \usepackage{colortbl}
- \usepackage{mathrsfs} % For Weinberg-esque letters
- \usepackage{cancel} % For "SUSY-breaking" symbol
- \usepackage{slashed} % for slashed characters in math mode
- \usepackage{bbm} % for \mathbbm{1} (unit matrix)
- \usepackage{amsthm} % For theorem environment
- \usepackage{multirow} % For multi row cells in table
- \usepackage{arydshln} % For dashed lines in arrays and tables
- \usepackage{siunitx}
- \usepackage{xhfill}
- \usepackage{grffile}
- \usepackage{textpos}
- \usepackage{subfigure}
- \usepackage{tikz}
-
- %\usepackage{hepparticles}
- \usepackage[italic]{hepparticles}
-
- \usepackage{hepnicenames}
-
- % Drawing a line
- \tikzstyle{lw} = [line width=20pt]
- \newcommand{\topline}{%
- \tikz[remember picture,overlay] {%
- \draw[crimsonred] ([yshift=-23.5pt]current page.north west)
- -- ([yshift=-23.5pt,xshift=\paperwidth]current page.north west);}}
-
-
-
- % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
- \usepackage{tikzfeynman} % For Feynman diagrams
- \usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes}
- \usetikzlibrary{trees}
- \usetikzlibrary{matrix,arrows} % For commutative diagram
- % http://www.felixl.de/commu.pdf
- \usetikzlibrary{positioning} % For "above of=" commands
- \usetikzlibrary{calc,through} % For coordinates
- \usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing} % For curly braces
- % http://www.math.ucla.edu/~getreuer/tikz.html
- \usepackage{pgffor} % For repeating patterns
-
- \usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing} % For Feynman Diagrams
- \usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
- \tikzset{
- % >=stealth', %% Uncomment for more conventional arrows
- vector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake}, draw},
- provector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake,amplitude=2.5pt}, draw},
- antivector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake,amplitude=-2.5pt}, draw},
- fermion/.style={draw=gray, postaction={decorate},
- decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=gray]{>}}}},
- fermionbar/.style={draw=gray, postaction={decorate},
- decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=gray]{<}}}},
- fermionnoarrow/.style={draw=gray},
- gluon/.style={decorate, draw=black,
- decoration={coil,amplitude=4pt, segment length=5pt}},
- scalar/.style={dashed,draw=black, postaction={decorate},
- decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=black]{>}}}},
- scalarbar/.style={dashed,draw=black, postaction={decorate},
- decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=black]{<}}}},
- scalarnoarrow/.style={dashed,draw=black},
- electron/.style={draw=black, postaction={decorate},
- decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=black]{>}}}},
- bigvector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake,amplitude=4pt}, draw},
- }
-
- % TIKZ - for block diagrams,
- % from http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/control-system-principles/
- % \usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows}
- \tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle,
- minimum height=3em, minimum width=6em]
-
-
-
-
- \usetikzlibrary{backgrounds}
- \usetikzlibrary{mindmap,trees} % For mind map
- \newcommand{\degree}{\ensuremath{^\circ}}
- \newcommand{\E}{\mathrm{E}}
- \newcommand{\Var}{\mathrm{Var}}
- \newcommand{\Cov}{\mathrm{Cov}}
- \newcommand\Ts{\rule{0pt}{2.6ex}} % Top strut
- \newcommand\Bs{\rule[-1.2ex]{0pt}{0pt}} % Bottom strut
-
- \graphicspath{{images/}} % Put all images in this directory. Avoids clutter.
-
- % SOME COMMANDS THAT I FIND HANDY
- % \renewcommand{\tilde}{\widetilde} % dinky tildes look silly, dosn't work with fontspec
- \newcommand{\comment}[1]{\textcolor{comment}{\footnotesize{#1}\normalsize}} % comment mild
- \newcommand{\Comment}[1]{\textcolor{Comment}{\footnotesize{#1}\normalsize}} % comment bold
- \newcommand{\COMMENT}[1]{\textcolor{COMMENT}{\footnotesize{#1}\normalsize}} % comment crazy bold
- \newcommand{\Alert}[1]{\textcolor{Alert}{#1}} % louder alert
- \newcommand{\ALERT}[1]{\textcolor{ALERT}{#1}} % loudest alert
- %% "\alert" is already a beamer pre-defined
- \newcommand*{\Scale}[2][4]{\scalebox{#1}{$#2$}}%
-
- \def\Put(#1,#2)#3{\leavevmode\makebox(0,0){\put(#1,#2){#3}}}
-
- \usepackage{gmp}
- \usepackage[final]{feynmp-auto}
-
- \usepackage[backend=bibtex,style=numeric-comp,firstinits=true]{biblatex}
- \bibliography{bib}
- \setbeamertemplate{bibliography item}[text]
-
- \makeatletter\let\frametextheight\beamer@frametextheight\makeatother
-
- % suppress frame numbering for backup slides
- % you always need the appendix for this!
- \newcommand{\backupbegin}{
- \newcounter{framenumberappendix}
- \setcounter{framenumberappendix}{\value{framenumber}}
- }
- \newcommand{\backupend}{
- \addtocounter{framenumberappendix}{-\value{framenumber}}
- \addtocounter{framenumber}{\value{framenumberappendix}}
- }
-
-
- \definecolor{links}{HTML}{2A1B81}
- %\hypersetup{colorlinks,linkcolor=,urlcolor=links}
-
- % For shapo's formulas:
- \def\lsi{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
- \def\gsi{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
- \newcommand{\lsim}{\mathop{\lsi}}
- \newcommand{\gsim}{\mathop{\gsi}}
- \newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}
- %\newcommand{\ol}{\overline}
- \newcommand{\Tr}{\rm{Tr}}
- \newcommand{\tr}{\rm{tr}}
- \newcommand{\eqn}[1]{&\hspace{-0.7em}#1\hspace{-0.7em}&}
- \newcommand{\vev}[1]{\rm{$\langle #1 \rangle$}}
- \newcommand{\abs}[1]{\rm{$\left| #1 \right|$}}
- \newcommand{\eV}{\rm{eV}}
- \newcommand{\keV}{\rm{keV}}
- \newcommand{\GeV}{\rm{GeV}}
- \newcommand{\im}{\rm{Im}}
- \newcommand{\disp}{\displaystyle}
- \def\be{\begin{equation}}
- \def\ee{\end{equation}}
- \def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
- \def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
- \def\d{\partial}
- \def\l{\left(}
- \def\r{\right)}
- \def\la{\langle}
- \def\ra{\rangle}
- \def\e{{\rm e}}
- \def\Br{{\rm Br}}
-
-
-
- \author{ {\fontspec{Trebuchet MS}Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz} (Universit\"{a}t Z\"{u}rich)}
- \institute{UZH}
- \title[$\PLambda \to \PLambda^{\ast}_c \mu \nu$ update]{$\PLambda \to \PLambda^{\ast}_c \mu \nu$ update}
- \date{01 March 2016}
-
-
- \begin{document}
- \tikzstyle{every picture}+=[remember picture]
-
- {
- \setbeamertemplate{sidebar right}{\llap{\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{bubble2}}}
- \begin{frame}[c]%{\phantom{title page}}
- \begin{center}
- \begin{center}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.75\textwidth}
- \flushright\fontspec{Trebuchet MS}\bfseries \Huge {$\PLambda \to \PLambda^{\ast}_c \mu \nu$ update}
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.02\textwidth}
- {~}
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.23\textwidth}
- % \hspace*{-1.cm}
- \vspace*{-3mm}
- \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{lhcb-logo}
- \end{column}
-
- \end{columns}
- \end{center}
- \quad
- \vspace{3em}
- \begin{columns}
- \begin{column}{0.44\textwidth}
- \flushright \vspace{-1.8em} {\fontspec{Trebuchet MS} \Large Marcin Chrząszcz\\ \begin{small}Elena Graverini\\ Nicola Serra \end{small}} %\\\vspace{-0.1em}\small \href{mailto:mchrzasz@cern.ch}{mchrzasz@cern.ch}}
-
- \end{column}
- \begin{column}{0.53\textwidth}
- \includegraphics[height=1.3cm]{uzh-transp}
- \end{column}
- \end{columns}
-
- \vspace{1em}
- % \footnotesize\textcolor{gray}{With N. Serra, B. Storaci\\Thanks to the theory support from M. Shaposhnikov, D. Gorbunov}\normalsize\\
- \vspace{0.5em}
-
- \textcolor{normal text.fg!50!Comment}{$R(\PLambda_c^{\ast})$ meeting, CERN\\March 04, 2016}
- \end{center}
- \end{frame}
- }
-
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Reminder}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ People reported that in case of $\PLambdab \to \PLambda_c \mu \nu$ decays there are asymmetric solution for the $\PLambdab$ momentum.
- \includegraphics[width=0.55\textwidth]{images/marcello.png}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ No one else have ever seen this in different decays so I started digging in.
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{How to calculate the $p(\PLambdab)$}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ One just needs to solve this equation:
- \begin{small}
- \begin{align*}
- \left[ \left( \dfrac{\hat{p}(\PLambda_b) \cdot \overrightarrow{p}(\Lambda_c\mu)}{E(\Lambda_c\mu)} \right)^2-1 \right] p(\PLambdab)^2 \\ + \left[ \left(m(\PLambda_b)^2+m(\PLambda_c\mu)^2 \right) \dfrac{\hat{p}(\PLambdab) \cdot \overrightarrow{p}(\PLambda_c \mu)}{E(\PLambda_c \mu)^2} \right] p(\PLambdab) \\ + \left[ \left( \dfrac{m(\PLambdab)^2+m(\PLambda_c \mu)^2}{2E(\Lambda_c \mu)} \right)^2 - m(\PLambda_b)^2 \right]=0
- \end{align*}
-
- \end{small}
- $\Rrightarrow$ The ambiguity comes from the fact that we do not know the direction of the $\nu$ in the $\PLambdab$ rest frame.
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Generator level}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Simulate stand alone Pythia + EvtGen with detector acceptance.\\
- \only<1>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{images/gen/results.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{images/gen/results2.png}
- \end{center}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: 0.516044, 0.483956
- }
- \only<2>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c(2595) \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/gen/results_2595}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/gen/results2_2595}.png}
- \end{center}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: 0.514349, 0.48565
- }
- \only<3>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c(2625) \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/gen/results_2625}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/gen/results2_2625}.png}
- \end{center}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: 0.515375 0.484625
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Generator has negligible asymmetries!
- }
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Reconstructed MC}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Full simulation after the stripping:
- \only<1>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results2_0000}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results2_1000}.png}
- \end{center}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Left: using stripped events but with true informations.\\
- $\Rrightarrow$ Right: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$ momentum
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: $60-40\%$
- }
-
- \only<2>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results2_1100}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results2_1111}.png}
- \end{center}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Left: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$, $\mu$ momentum\\
- $\Rrightarrow$ Right: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$, $\mu$ momentum and $\PLambda_b$ direction.
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: $60-40\%$
- }
-
-
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Warning on $\PLambda_b$ direction}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ The $\PLambdab$ direction versor is calculated connecting the closest PV with the $\PLambda_b$ vertex\footnote{This is what is written in Syracuse ANA note}
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/results_0.png}s
-
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Warning on $\PLambda_b$ direction}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ One should instead use the closes PV that is ''behind'' the $\PLambdab$ vertex. This increases the number of solutions by $25\%$.
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.95\textwidth]{images/results_1.png}
-
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Warning on $\PLambda_b$ direction}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ This requirement does not change the resolution when the solution exists.
-
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results2_1111}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results2_1110}.png}
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Reconstructed MC}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Full simulation after the stripping:
- \only<1>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c(2595) \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_25952_0000}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_25952_1000}.png}
- \end{center}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Left: using stripped events but with true informations.\\
- $\Rrightarrow$ Right: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$ momentum
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: $60-40\%$
- }
-
- \only<2>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c(2595) \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_25952_1100}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_25952_1111}.png}
- \end{center}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Left: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$, $\mu$ momentum\\
- $\Rrightarrow$ Right: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$, $\mu$ momentum and $\PLambda_b$ direction.
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: $60-40\%$
- }
-
-
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Reconstructed MC}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
- $\Rrightarrow$ Full simulation after the stripping:
- \only<1>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c(2625) \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_26252_0000}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_26252_1000}.png}
- \end{center}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Left: using stripped events but with true informations.\\
- $\Rrightarrow$ Right: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$ momentum
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: $60-40\%$
- }
-
- \only<2>{
- $\Rrightarrow$ $\PLambda_b \to \PLambda_c(2625) \mu \nu$:
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_26252_1100}.png}
- \includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{{images/reco/results_26252_1111}.png}
- \end{center}
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Left: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$, $\mu$ momentum\\
- $\Rrightarrow$ Right: using stripped events with true information besides $\PLambda_c$, $\mu$ momentum and $\PLambda_b$ direction.
-
- $\Rrightarrow$ Fractions of correct solution: $60-40\%$
- }
-
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
- \begin{frame}[c]{Conclusions}
- \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
-
- \begin{itemize}
- \item The MC generator is ok.
- \item The is a constant (within $1\%$) 60:40 fraction in preferring the lower solution.
- \item So it can be either reconstruction or stripping.
- \item I think the stripping as when I replace the reconstructed quantity with the truth one I am getting a constant fraction of 60:40.
- \item The only way to know is to run a cheated selection on MC and discover some idiot fuc.. the stripping line ;)
- \end{itemize}
-
-
- \end{minipage}
- \vspace*{2.cm}
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- \backupbegin
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Backup}
- \topline
-
- \end{frame}
-
- \backupend
-
- \end{document}