- % This program can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms
- % of the GNU Public License, version 3.
- %
- % Seth Brown, Ph.D.
- % sethbrown@drbunsen.org
- %
- % Compiled with XeLaTeX
- % Dependencies:
- % Fontin Sans font (http://www.exljbris.com/fontinsans.fsrtml)
- %
- \documentclass{beamer}
- \usepackage{pgf}
- \usepackage{tikz}
- \usepackage{times}
- \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
- %\usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
- %\usepackage{mathptmx}
- %\usepackage{mathrsfs}
- \usepackage{hyperref}
- \usepackage{color}
- \usepackage{graphicx}
- \usepackage{wasysym}
- % \usepackage{pgfpagfes}
- % \setbeameroption{show notes on second screen}
- %\pgfpagesuselayout{4 on 1}[a4paper,border shrink=5mm,landscape]
- \usepackage{xcolor}
- \usepackage{xcolor,multirow}
-
- %\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
- %\usepackage[dvipsnames]{xcolor}
- %\usepackage{amsfonts}
- %\usepackage{amsmath}
- % \usepackage[amssymb]{SIunits}
- %\usepackage{natbib}
- %\usepackage{amssymb}
- \usepackage{hepparticles}
- \usepackage{hepnicenames}
- \usepackage{hepunits}
- \usepackage{tikz}
- \usepackage[english]{babel}
- %%\usepackage{lmodern}
- %\usepackage{feynmp}
- % suppress navigation bar
- \beamertemplatenavigationsymbolsempty
- \usepackage[mathscr]{eucal}
- \usepackage{mathrsfs}
- \mode<presentation>
- {
- \usetheme{bunsen}
- \setbeamercovered{transparent}
- \setbeamertemplate{items}[circle]
- }
- \newcommand{\Simley}[1]{%
- \begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.15]
- \newcommand*{\SmileyRadius}{1.0}%
- \draw [fill=brown!10] (0,0) circle (\SmileyRadius)% outside circle
- %node [yshift=-0.22*\SmileyRadius cm] {\tiny #1}% uncomment this to see the smile factor
- ;
-
- \pgfmathsetmacro{\eyeX}{0.5*\SmileyRadius*cos(30)}
- \pgfmathsetmacro{\eyeY}{0.5*\SmileyRadius*sin(30)}
- \draw [fill=cyan,draw=none] (\eyeX,\eyeY) circle (0.15cm);
- \draw [fill=cyan,draw=none] (-\eyeX,\eyeY) circle (0.15cm);
-
- \pgfmathsetmacro{\xScale}{2*\eyeX/180}
- \pgfmathsetmacro{\yScale}{1.0*\eyeY}
- \draw[color=red, domain=-\eyeX:\eyeX]
- plot ({\x},{
- -0.1+#1*0.15 % shift the smiley as smile decreases
- -#1*1.75*\yScale*(sin((\x+\eyeX)/\xScale))-\eyeY});
- \end{tikzpicture}%
- }%
- % set fonts
- \usepackage{amsfonts}
- \usepackage{amsmath}
- \usepackage{verbatim}
-
- \usepackage{fancyvrb}
- \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{code}{Verbatim}{fontsize=\small}
- \DefineVerbatimEnvironment{example}{Verbatim}{fontsize=\small}
- \usepackage{listings}
- \usepackage{courier}
- \lstset{
- basicstyle=\footnotesize\ttfamily, % Standardschrift
- %numbers=left, % Ort der Zeilennummern
- numberstyle=\tiny, % Stil der Zeilennummern
- %stepnumber=2, % Abstand zwischen den Zeilennummern
- numbersep=5pt, % Abstand der Nummern zum Text
- tabsize=2, % Groesse von Tabs
- extendedchars=true, %
- breaklines=true, % Zeilen werden Umgebrochen
- keywordstyle=\color{red},
- frame=b,
- % keywordstyle=[1]\textbf, % Stil der Keywords
- % keywordstyle=[2]\textbf, %
- % keywordstyle=[3]\textbf, %
- % keywordstyle=[4]\textbf, \sqrt{\sqrt{}} %
- stringstyle=\color{white}\ttfamily, % Farbe der String
- showspaces=false, % Leerzeichen anzeigen ?
- showtabs=false, % Tabs anzeigen ?
- xleftmargin=17pt,
- framexleftmargin=17pt,
- framexrightmargin=5pt,
- framexbottommargin=4pt,
- %backgroundcolor=\color{lightgray},
- showstringspaces=false % Leerzeichen in Strings anzeigen ?
- }
-
- %\DeclareCaptionFont{blue}{\color{blue}}
-
- %\captionsetup[lstlisting]{singlelinecheck=false, labelfont={blue}, textfont={blue}}
- \usepackage{caption}
- \DeclareCaptionFont{white}{\color{white}}
- \DeclareCaptionFormat{listing}{\colorbox[cmyk]{0.43, 0.35, 0.35,0.01}{\parbox{\textwidth}{\hspace{15pt}#1#2#3}}}
- \captionsetup[lstlisting]{format=listing,labelfont=white,textfont=white, singlelinecheck=false, margin=0pt, font={bf,footnotesize}}
- \usetikzlibrary{arrows}
- \usetikzlibrary{shapes}
-
- %\usepackage{gfsartemisia-euler}
- %\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
- \setbeamerfont{frametitle}{size=\LARGE,series=\bfseries}
- \tikzstyle{decision} = [diamond, draw, fill=gray!20,
- text width=4.5em, text badly centered, node distance=3cm, inner sep=0pt]
- \tikzstyle{block} = [rectangle, draw, fill=blue!10,
- text width=5em, text centered, rounded corners, minimum height=2em]
- \tikzstyle{line} = [draw, -latex']
- \tikzstyle{cloud} = [draw, ellipse,fill=red!10, node distance=3cm,
- minimum height=2em]
-
- \tikzstyle{every picture}+=[remember picture]
-
-
- \renewcommand{\PKs}{{\HepParticle{K}{S}{}\xspace}}
- % color definitions
- \usepackage{color}
- \definecolor{uipoppy}{RGB}{225, 64, 5}
- \definecolor{uipaleblue}{RGB}{96,123,139}
- \definecolor{uiblack}{RGB}{0, 0, 0}
-
- % caption styling
- %\DeclareCaptionFont{uiblack}{\color{uiblack}}
- %\DeclareCaptionFont{uipoppy}{\color{uipoppy}}
- %\captionsetup{labelfont={uipoppy},textfont=uiblack}
-
- % see the macros.tex file for definitions
- \include{macros }
-
- % title slide definition
- \title{$\tau \to 3\mu$ Status Update}
- \author{Johannes Albrecht$^{1}$,Marta Calvi$^2$, \underline{Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz}$^{3,4}$, Jon Harrison$^{5}$, Basem Khanji$^{2}$, George Lafferty$^{5}$, Nicola Serra$^{3}$, Paul Seyfert$^6$}
- \institute[UZH, IFJ]
- {
- $^{1}$ Dortmund, $^{2}$ Milano, $^{3}$ Zurich, $^{4}$ Krakow,\\ $^{5}$ ManchesterManchester, $^{6}$ Heidelberg
- }
-
-
-
-
- \date{ \begin{small} $28^{th}$ August 2013 \end{small}}
-
- %--------------------------------------------------------------------
- % Introduction
- %--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- \begin{document}
-
-
-
-
- \setbeamertemplate{background}
- {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{frontpage_bg_mine}}
- \setbeamertemplate{footline}[default]
-
- \begin{frame}
- \vspace{1.1cm}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.75in}
- \titlepage
-
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[height=1.0cm ]{pic/uzh.jpg}
- % \hspace{0.5cm}
- % \includegraphics[height=1.5cm]{pic/babar.jpg}
- \hspace{1cm}
- \includegraphics[height=1.0cm]{pic/ifj.png}
- \hspace{1cm}
- %\includegraphics[height=1.0cm]{pic/SNS.jpg}
- \end{center}
- \vspace{10cm}
- \column{2.0in}
- \end{columns}
- \end{frame}
-
- %--------------------------------------------------------------------
- % OUTLINE
- %--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- \section[Outline]{}
- \begin{frame}
- \tableofcontents
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
- %-------------------------------------------------------------------
- % Introduction
- %-------------------------------------------------------------------
- %
- % Set the background for the rest of the slides.
- % Insert infoline
- \setbeamertemplate{background}
- {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{slide_bg}}
- \setbeamertemplate{footline}[bunsentheme]
-
- \title{Update on analysis}
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
- \setbeamertemplate{background}
- {\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{slide_bg}}
- \setbeamertemplate{footline}[bunsentheme]
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%2>%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
- \section{Status}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Status}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2in}
- \begin{center}
- $1 $fb$^{-1}$ analysis of \textcolor{violet}{$\tau \to \mu \mu \mu$} and \textcolor{blue}{$\tau \to p \mu \mu$} appeared in PLB.
-
- \end{center}
-
-
- \column{3in}
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.197]{RD_meeting/PLB.png}
- \end{columns}
-
- \begin{exampleblock}{2011 results:} \begin{enumerate}
- \item Obtained limit for $\tau \to \mu \mu \mu$: $8.0 \times 10^{-8}$.
- \item BaBar and Belle: $2.1 (3.2) \times 10^{-8}$ at $90\%$ CL.
- \item For 2012 + 2011 planned to implement several improvements.
-
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
-
- \section{MC Samples}
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{MC Samples}
- \only<1>
- {
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
- \item In 2011 analysis one of the biggest contributions to the systematic error from MC was the reweighting the MC signal for the correct cross section.
- \item For 2012 we solved this problem by simulating signal in 5 parts. One for each production channel(normalization to 1M events):
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
- }
-
- \begin{center}
-
- \fcolorbox{blue}{yellow}{
- %\begin{equation}NUmber of ne
-
- $\tau \to \mu \mu \mu = \begin{cases}
- \PB \to \Ptau \to \mu \mu \mu & 116,600 \\
- \PB \to \PDs \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 87,200\\
- \PB \to \PD \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 1,800\\
- \PDs \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 750,600\\
- \PD \to \tau \to \mu \mu \mu & 43,800
-
- \end{cases}$
- %\end{equation}
-
- }
- % $\HepParticle{B}{}{\pm} \to \HepParticle{D}{}{(\ast)} \tau^{\pm} \nu$}
- \end{center}
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{MC Generator Cuts}
- \only<1>
- {
- In order to reduce the number of unwanted events we introduced generator level cuts.
- \begin{center}
- \begin{tabular}{ | c | c || l | c |}
- \hline
- \multicolumn{2}{|c|| }{Signal sample\footnote{$X \to \tau\to 3\mu$, $\PDs \to \eta(\mu\mu \gamma) \mu \nu$, $\PDs \to \phi(\mu\mu) \pi$ }} & \multicolumn{2}{|c| }{Background sample(Dimuon)\footnote{$c\bar{c}$, $b\bar{b}$ }} \\ \hline \hline
- $p_{t\mu}$ & $>250MeV$ & $p_{t\mu}$ & $>280MeV$ \\ \hline
- $p_{\mu}$ & $>2.5GeV$ & $p_{\mu}$ & $>2.9GeV$ \\ \cline{3-4}
- & & $m(\mu\mu)$ & $<4.5GeV$\\ \cline{3-4}
- & & DOCA$(\mu\mu)$ & $<0.35mm$\\ \hline
- \end{tabular}
- \end{center}
- }
- Gain a factor of $\sim 8$ in statistics compared to 2011.
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
- \section{Normalization channel}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Normalization channel}
- \only<1>
- {
- As last year we will use \textcolor{blue}{$\PDs \to \phi(\mu\mu) \pi$}. Events are split into 2 categories:
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
- \item $cc \to \PDs \to \phi (\mu\mu) \pi$ 897,000
- \item $bb \to \PDs \to \phi (\mu\mu) \pi$ 103,000
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
- We avoid reweighting of the samples as in 2011.
-
- }
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Mass correction}
- \only<1>
- {
- \begin{center}
- \begin{tiny}
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- $D_s \to \phi(\mu\mu)\pi$ in data.\\
- \includegraphics[scale=0.14]{Ds_Mass/Ds_mass_data.png} \\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item mean = $1970.3 \pm 0.9 MeV$
- \end{itemize}
- \end{center}
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- $D_s \to \phi(\mu\mu)\pi$ in MC.\\
- \includegraphics[scale=0.14]{Ds_Mass/D_mass_base.png}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item mean = $1969.1 \pm 0.60 MeV$
- \end{itemize}
- \end{center}
- \end{columns}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \begin{small}
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $m_{\tau \to 3\mu} = \dfrac{1970.3}{1969.1} \times 1777.7 =$\textcolor{blue}{$ 1778.8 \pm 1.1 MeV$}
- \end{itemize}
- {~} \\ In agreement with 2011.
- \end{small}
- \end{center}
-
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- Fit $\tau \to \mu\mu\mu$ in MC. \\
- \includegraphics[scale=0.14]{Ds_Mass/tau_mass_base.png}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item mean = $1777.7 \pm 0.4 MeV$ \\
- \end{itemize}
-
- \end{center}
- \end{columns}
-
- \end{tiny}
- \end{center}
-
- }
-
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
- \section{Peaking backgrounds}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Peaking backgrounds}
- \only<1>
- {
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
- \item The dominant background source of peaking background in this analysis is \textcolor{blue}{$\PDs \to \eta(\mu\mu\gamma) \mu \nu$}\\
- \item In 2011 we suffered from lack of MC statistics.
- \item Thanks to generator cuts our pdfs became more stable.
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
-
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.11]{RD_meeting/pid_0_65_0_725geo-0_48_0_05.png} \\
- \begin{tiny} PID:$0.65;0.725$,GEO:$-0.48;0.05$ \end{tiny}
- \end{center}
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.11]{RD_meeting/pid_0_725_0_86geo0_35_0_65.png}\\
- \begin{tiny} PID:$0.725;0.0.86$,GEO:$0.35;0.65$ \end{tiny}
-
- \end{center}
- \end{columns}
- }
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
-
- \section{Normalization}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Normalization}
- \only<1>
- {
- For the normalization of background samples($c\bar{c}$ and $b\bar{b}$) we used generator cuts efficiencies and corrected the nominal cross section accordingly:\\
- \begin{center}
- $\mathcal{L} = \dfrac{N_{MC}}{\varepsilon_{acc} \times \varepsilon_{gen} \times \sigma{LHCb}}$
- \end{center}
- The obtained luminosities(per 1M events):
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
- \item $\mathcal{L}_{cc} = 0.25 \pm 0.04 pb^{-1}$
- \item $\mathcal{L}_{bb} = 1.20 \pm 0.15 pb^{-1}$
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
-
- }
- Dominant uncertainty from the cross section.
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
-
- \section{Isolating parameter}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Isolating parameters}
- {~}
-
-
- \only<1>
- {
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
-
- \item In 2011 we used the isolation parameter developed for $\PBs \to \mu\mu$. For 2012 data we optimised the isolation parameter for our channel based on MVA(BDT).
- \item Instead of training on isolating vs non-isoalting tracks we train on combinatorial background vs signal.
- \item We see big improvement compared to old isolation.
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
-
- }
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.18]{RD_meeting/mva_BDT.png} \\
-
- \end{center}
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.17]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS.png}\\
-
- \end{center}
- \end{columns}
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
- \section{Ensemble Selection}
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Ensemble Selection}
- {~}
- \only<1>
- {
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
- \item In the last few years people winning leading machine learning contests started to combine their classifiers to squeeze the best out of them.
- \item This technique/method is know as Ensemble Selection or Blending.
- \item The plan for $\tau \to \mu \mu \mu$ is to take it to the next level.
- \item Combine not only different channels, but also different $\tau$ sources(slide 4).
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
-
- }
- \only<2>
- {
-
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_21513000.png}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $\PB \to \PD \to \tau$
- \end{itemize}
- \end{center}
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_21513001.png}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $\PD \to \tau$
- \end{itemize}
- \end{center}
- \end{columns}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_23513000.png}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $\PB \to \PDs \to \tau$
- \end{itemize}
- \end{center}
-
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \begin{center}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.16]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_23513001.png}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item $\PDs \to \tau$
- \end{itemize}
- \end{center}
- \end{columns}
-
-
- }
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz, N.Serra 2013}
-
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5555
- \section{Binning optimisation}
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Binning optimisation}
- {~}
- \only<1>
- {
- For the 2011 analysis we had two classifiers: $PIDNN$ and $M_{GEO}$. Each of them we optimised separately. For the 2012 analysis we are performing a simultaneous 2D optimisation.
-
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.13]{inflaton/punzi1.png}
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{RD_meeting/2d-data.pdf}
-
- \end{columns}
-
- }
-
- \end{frame}
- \section{Conclusions}
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Conclusions}
- {~}
- \only<1>
- {
- \begin{exampleblock}{~}
- \begin{enumerate}
- \item Analysis is well underway.
- \item MC samples are almost there.
- \item Hope to improve the selection.
- \item $\tau \to p \mu \mu$ mode will be studied in parallel.
- \end{enumerate}
- \end{exampleblock}
- }
- \includegraphics[scale=0.45]{RD_meeting/phd052805.png}\\
-
-
-
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
-
- \begin{frame}
- {~}
- \begin{Huge}
- BACKUP
- \end{Huge}
-
-
- \end{frame}
-
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%55
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{$B \to \tau$}
- {~}\\
- We really suck in selecting this channel.
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_31113002.png}
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{$B \to D_s \to \tau$}
- {~}\\
- On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_23513000.png}
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{$D_s \to \tau$}
- {~}\\
- On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_23513001.png}
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{$B \to D^+ \to \tau$}
- {~}\\
- On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/21513000_roc2.png}
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{$D^+ \to \tau$}
- {~}\\
- On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/ROC_21513001.png}
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
-
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Comparison on mix sample}
- {~}\\
- On the biggest contributing channel we are quite optimal.
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.4]{tmva/mix.png}
-
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Conclusions on TMVA}
- {~}\\
- \begin{itemize}
- \item Each of the signal components is enormously larger than MVA trained on mix.
- \item Method looks very promising if we can find a nice blending method(work for next week).
- \item Mayby discusion on TMVA/MatrixNet/Neurobayes is next to leading order effect compared to this method?
-
-
- \end{itemize}
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
- \begin{frame}\frametitle{Comparison on mix sample}
- {~}\\
- \begin{columns}
- \column{2.5in}
-
-
- \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_oryginal.png}
-
- \column{2.5in}
- \includegraphics[scale=0.27]{RD_meeting/rejBvsS_blend.png}
-
- \end{columns}
-
-
- \textref {M.Chrz\k{a}szcz 2013}
- \end{frame}
-
-
-
- \end{document}