\documentclass[xcolor=svgnames]{beamer}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{polski}
%\usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
%\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}
%\usepackage{amsmath}
%\newcommand\abs[1]{\left|#1\right|}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\newcommand\abs[1]{\left|#1\right|}
\usepackage{hepnicenames}
\usepackage{hepunits}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{mathrsfs}
\setbeamertemplate{footline}{\insertframenumber/\inserttotalframenumber}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
\definecolor{mygreen}{cmyk}{0.82,0.11,1,0.25}


\usetheme{Sybila} 

\title[RECO 12 vs 14, vol 1]{RECO 12 vs 14, vol 1}
\author{Tom Blake$^{1}$,~Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz$^{2,3}$}
\institute{$^1$~University of Warwick,\\ $^2$~University of Zurich,\\ $^3$~Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow}
\date{\today}
\begin{document}
% --------------------------- SLIDE --------------------------------------------
\frame[plain]{\titlepage}
\author{Tom Blake, Marcin Chrz\k{a}szcz}
% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% --------------------------- SLIDE --------------------------------------------

\institute{~(UW, UZH, IFJ)}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{Basics}
As you should now from email exchange:
\begin{itemize}
\item $\PBzero \to \PKstar \mu \mu$ PHPS MC was produced.
\item We also have SM MC.
\item $\PJpsi \PKstar$ on way(later today we should have it).
\item All are SIM08
\item For now $4~TeV$ data, $3.5~TeV$ in queue.
\item The same events(common, Gauss, Boole, Moore) are processed by 2 different Brunel versions(one for RECO12, other for RECO14).
\item Since I don't have full selection, I am studying the events that pass our stripping 20.
\item Events are truth matched between two ntuples using EVENTNUMBER.
\end{itemize}
   

\end{frame}
\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots 1}

\begin{itemize}
\item RECO 12 and STRIPPING 20 selected 5054
\item Among those 4667 are also selected by RECO 14 and our stripping.
\item The over lap is about $92.3 \pm 0.4 \%$.
\item A bit higher compared to what we saw in data....
\end{itemize}
   

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PBzero$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_DIRA.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_FD.png}
\end{columns}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_FDCHI2.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_IP.png}
\end{columns}

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PBzero$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_IPCHI2.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_MM.png}
\end{columns}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_P.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_PT.png}
\end{columns}

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PBzero$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_tau.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/B0_VRTXCHI2.png}
\end{columns}

\end{frame}




\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\PK$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/K_P.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/K_PT.png}
\end{columns}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/K_TRK_CHI2.png}
\column{2.5in}
{~}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\Ppi$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Pi_P.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Pi_PT.png}
\end{columns}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Pi_TRK_CHI2.png}
\column{2.5in}
{~}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}



\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\Pmuon$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mum_P.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mum_PT.png}
\end{columns}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mum_TRK_CHI2.png}
\column{2.5in}
{~}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{Results/Plots $\APmuon$}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}

\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mup_P.png}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mup_PT.png}
\end{columns}
\begin{columns}
\column{2.5in}
\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{RECO/Mup_TRK_CHI2.png}
\column{2.5in}
{~}
\end{columns}
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}\frametitle{Conclusions}
\begin{enumerate}
\item The spread of the variables looks smaller then in data.
\item This needs further investigations: $\PJpsi \PKstar$, full selection, $3.5~TeV$,(more suggestions?)
\item What else should I compare? PID? other? Let me know.
\item The thing that comes to my mind when I look at those plots is: 
\end{enumerate}

\begin{center}
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."
\end{center}




\end{frame}

\end{document}
