\documentclass[11 pt,xcolor={dvipsnames,svgnames,x11names,table}]{beamer}

\usepackage[english]{babel}
\usepackage{polski}


\usetheme[
	bullet=circle,		% Other option: square
	bigpagenumber,		% circled page number on lower right
	topline=true,			% colored bar at the top of the frame
	shadow=false,			% Shading for beamer blocks
	watermark=BG_lower,	% png file for the watermark
	]{Flip}

%\logo{\kern+1.em\includegraphics[height=1cm]{SHiP-3_LightCharcoal}}


\usepackage[lf]{berenis}
\usepackage[LY1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

\usefonttheme{professionalfonts}
\usepackage[no-math]{fontspec}
\defaultfontfeatures{Mapping=tex-text}	% This seems to be important for mapping glyphs properly

\setmainfont{Gillius ADF}			% Beamer ignores "main font" in favor of sans font
\setsansfont{Gillius ADF}			% This is the font that beamer will use by default
% \setmainfont{Gill Sans Light}		% Prettier, but harder to read

\setbeamerfont{title}{family=\fontspec{Gillius ADF}}

\input t1augie.fd

%\newcommand{\handwriting}{\fontspec{augie}} % From Emerald City, free font
%\newcommand{\handwriting}{\usefont{T1}{fau}{m}{n}} % From Emerald City, free font
% \newcommand{\handwriting}{}	% If you prefer no special handwriting font or don't have augie

%% Gill Sans doesn't look very nice when boldfaced
%% This is a hack to use Helvetica instead
%% Usage: \textbf{\forbold some stuff}
%\newcommand{\forbold}{\fontspec{Arial}}

\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage[export]{adjustbox}

\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{bm}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\usepackage{mathrsfs} 			% For Weinberg-esque letters
\usepackage{cancel}				% For "SUSY-breaking" symbol
\usepackage{slashed}            % for slashed characters in math mode
\usepackage{bbm}                % for \mathbbm{1} (unit matrix)
\usepackage{amsthm}				% For theorem environment
\usepackage{multirow}			% For multi row cells in table
\usepackage{arydshln} 			% For dashed lines in arrays and tables
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{xhfill}
\usepackage{grffile}
\usepackage{textpos}
\usepackage{subfigure}
\usepackage{tikz}

%\usepackage{hepparticles}
\usepackage[italic]{hepparticles}

\usepackage{hepnicenames}

% Drawing a line
\tikzstyle{lw} = [line width=20pt]
\newcommand{\topline}{%
  \tikz[remember picture,overlay] {%
    \draw[crimsonred] ([yshift=-23.5pt]current page.north west)
             -- ([yshift=-23.5pt,xshift=\paperwidth]current page.north west);}}



% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % %
\usepackage{tikzfeynman}		% For Feynman diagrams
\usetikzlibrary{arrows,shapes}
\usetikzlibrary{trees}
\usetikzlibrary{matrix,arrows} 				% For commutative diagram
% http://www.felixl.de/commu.pdf
\usetikzlibrary{positioning}				% For "above of=" commands
\usetikzlibrary{calc,through}				% For coordinates
\usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathreplacing}  % For curly braces
% http://www.math.ucla.edu/~getreuer/tikz.html
\usepackage{pgffor}							% For repeating patterns

\usetikzlibrary{decorations.pathmorphing}	% For Feynman Diagrams
\usetikzlibrary{decorations.markings}
\tikzset{
	% >=stealth', %%  Uncomment for more conventional arrows
	vector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake}, draw},
	provector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake,amplitude=2.5pt}, draw},
	antivector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake,amplitude=-2.5pt}, draw},
	fermion/.style={draw=gray, postaction={decorate},
		decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=gray]{>}}}},
	fermionbar/.style={draw=gray, postaction={decorate},
		decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=gray]{<}}}},
	fermionnoarrow/.style={draw=gray},
	gluon/.style={decorate, draw=black,
		decoration={coil,amplitude=4pt, segment length=5pt}},
	scalar/.style={dashed,draw=black, postaction={decorate},
		decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=black]{>}}}},
	scalarbar/.style={dashed,draw=black, postaction={decorate},
		decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=black]{<}}}},
	scalarnoarrow/.style={dashed,draw=black},
	electron/.style={draw=black, postaction={decorate},
		decoration={markings,mark=at position .55 with {\arrow[draw=black]{>}}}},
	bigvector/.style={decorate, decoration={snake,amplitude=4pt}, draw},
}

% TIKZ - for block diagrams,
% from http://www.texample.net/tikz/examples/control-system-principles/
% \usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows}
\tikzstyle{block} = [draw, rectangle,
minimum height=3em, minimum width=6em]




\usetikzlibrary{backgrounds}
\usetikzlibrary{mindmap,trees}	% For mind map
\newcommand{\degree}{\ensuremath{^\circ}}
\newcommand{\E}{\mathrm{E}}
\newcommand{\TeV}{\mathrm{TeV}}
\newcommand{\Var}{\mathrm{Var}}
\newcommand{\Cov}{\mathrm{Cov}}
\newcommand\Ts{\rule{0pt}{2.6ex}}       % Top strut
\newcommand\Bs{\rule[-1.2ex]{0pt}{0pt}} % Bottom strut

\graphicspath{{images/}}	% Put all images in this directory. Avoids clutter.

% SOME COMMANDS THAT I FIND HANDY
% \renewcommand{\tilde}{\widetilde} % dinky tildes look silly, dosn't work with fontspec
\newcommand{\comment}[1]{\textcolor{comment}{\footnotesize{#1}\normalsize}} % comment mil	
\newcommand{\Comment}[1]{\textcolor{Comment}{\footnotesize{#1}\normalsize}} % comment bold
\newcommand{\COMMENT}[1]{\textcolor{COMMENT}{\footnotesize{#1}\normalsize}} % comment crazy bold
\newcommand{\Alert}[1]{\textcolor{Alert}{#1}} % louder alert
\newcommand{\ALERT}[1]{\textcolor{ALERT}{#1}} % loudest alert
%% "\alert" is already a beamer pre-defined
\newcommand*{\Scale}[2][4]{\scalebox{#1}{$#2$}}%

\def\Put(#1,#2)#3{\leavevmode\makebox(0,0){\put(#1,#2){#3}}}

\usepackage{gmp}
\usepackage[final]{feynmp-auto}

\usepackage[backend=bibtex,style=numeric-comp,firstinits=true]{biblatex}
\bibliography{bib}
\setbeamertemplate{bibliography item}[text]

\makeatletter\let\frametextheight\beamer@frametextheight\makeatother

% suppress frame numbering for backup slides
% you always need the appendix for this!
\newcommand{\backupbegin}{
	\newcounter{framenumberappendix}
	\setcounter{framenumberappendix}{\value{framenumber}}
}
\newcommand{\backupend}{
	\addtocounter{framenumberappendix}{-\value{framenumber}}
	\addtocounter{framenumber}{\value{framenumberappendix}}
}


\definecolor{links}{HTML}{2A1B81}
%\hypersetup{colorlinks,linkcolor=,urlcolor=links}

% For shapo's formulas:
\def\lsi{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
\def\gsi{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}
\newcommand{\lsim}{\mathop{\lsi}}
\newcommand{\gsim}{\mathop{\gsi}}
\newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}
%\newcommand{\ol}{\overline}
\newcommand{\Tr}{\rm{Tr}}
\newcommand{\tr}{\rm{tr}}
\newcommand{\eqn}[1]{&\hspace{-0.7em}#1\hspace{-0.7em}&}
\newcommand{\vev}[1]{\rm{$\langle #1 \rangle$}}
\newcommand{\abs}[1]{\rm{$\left| #1 \right|$}}
\newcommand{\eV}{\rm{eV}}
\newcommand{\keV}{\rm{keV}}
\newcommand{\GeV}{\rm{GeV}}
\newcommand{\im}{\rm{Im}}
\newcommand{\disp}{\displaystyle}
\def\be{\begin{equation}}
\def\ee{\end{equation}}
\def\ba{\begin{eqnarray}}
\def\ea{\end{eqnarray}}
\def\d{\partial}
\def\l{\left(}
\def\r{\right)}
\def\la{\langle}
\def\ra{\rangle}
\def\e{{\rm e}}
\def\Br{{\rm Br}}
\def\fixme{FIXME}



\def\ARROW{{\color{JungleGreen}{$\Rrightarrow$}}\xspace}
\def\ARROWR{{\color{WildStrawberry}{$\Rrightarrow$}}\xspace}

\author{ {Marcin Chrzaszcz} (CERN)}
\institute{UZH}
\title[Follow up questions]{Follow up questions}


\begin{document}
\tikzstyle{every picture}+=[remember picture]

{
\setbeamertemplate{sidebar right}{\llap{\includegraphics[width=\paperwidth,height=\paperheight]{bubble2}}}
\begin{frame}[c]%{\phantom{title page}}
\begin{center}
\begin{center}
	\begin{columns}
		\begin{column}{0.75\textwidth}
			\flushright \bfseries \Huge {Follow up questions}
		\end{column}
                \begin{column}{0.02\textwidth}
                  {~}
                  \end{column}
                \begin{column}{0.23\textwidth}
                 % \hspace*{-1.cm}
                  \vspace*{-3mm}
                  \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{lhcb-logo}
                  \end{column}

	\end{columns}
\end{center}
	\quad
	\vspace{3em}
\begin{columns}
\begin{column}{0.99\textwidth}
J.~Albrecht$^1$, J.~Bhom$^2$, M.~Chrzaszcz$^{4}$, G.Meier$^{1}$,                                                                                               
%V.~Gligorov$^{5}$,                                                                                                                                            
T~.Momb\"acher$^{1}$, M.~Pikies$^{2}$, F.~Polci$^{5}$, S.~Reichert$^{1}$, N.~Serra$^{3}$                                                                       
\bigskip\\                                                                                                                                                     
$^1$ Dortmund , $^2$ Krakow, $^3$ Z\"{u}rich, $^4$CERN, $^5$LPNHE
\end{column}
%\begin{column}{0.53\textwidth}
%\includegraphics[height=1.3cm]{uzh-transp}
%\end{column}
\end{columns}

\vspace{5em}
%		\footnotesize\textcolor{gray}{With N. Serra, B. Storaci\\Thanks to the theory support from M. Shaposhnikov, D. Gorbunov}\normalsize\\
\vspace{0.5em}

	\textcolor{normal text.fg!50!Comment}{$\PB \to \PK e \mu$ RC meeting, April 24, 2019}
\end{center}
\end{frame}
}





\begin{frame}\frametitle{Reminder}

\ARROW In the last meeting 3 things were requested:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Increase the systematic due to VTX $\chi^2$ reweighing.\\ {\color{ForestGreen} Done, nothing changed due to rounding precision.}
\pause
\item Tackle the large weight problems.
\item Provide a better efficiency maps.
\end{enumerate}

\end{frame}




\begin{frame}\frametitle{The problem of efficiency maps}
\ARROW After we divide the 2 histograms we have large weights on the edges:

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.75\textwidth]{{images/B2Kemu_weights}.pdf}

\end{frame}



\begin{frame}\frametitle{The (NOT)solution}

\ARROW Apply cuts: $m_{Ke}>0.6~\GeV$ and $m_{e\mu}>0.2~\GeV$

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.75\textwidth]{{images/B2Kemu_weights_my1}.pdf}

\ARROW Not really solving the problem...


\end{frame}

\begin{frame}\frametitle{The (NOT)solution 2}

\ARROW Apply cuts: $m_{Ke}>1.0~\GeV$ and $m_{e\mu}>1.0~\GeV$

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.75\textwidth]{{images/B2Kemu_weights_my2}.pdf}

\ARROW Not really solving the problem...


\end{frame}

\begin{frame}\frametitle{The (NOT)solution 3}

\ARROW Apply cuts: $m_{Ke}>1.0~\GeV$ and $m_{e\mu}>1.0~\GeV$ and $m_{K\mu}>0.7~\GeV$

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.75\textwidth]{{images/B2Kemu_weights_my3}.pdf}

\ARROW Not really solving the problem...


\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{The (NOT)solution 3}

\ARROW Apply cuts: $m_{Ke}>1.0~\GeV$ and $m_{e\mu}>1.0~\GeV$ and $m_{K\mu}>1.5~\GeV$

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.75\textwidth]{{images/B2Kemu_weights_my4}.pdf}

\ARROW Not really solving the problem...


\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{The (NOT)solution}

\ARROW No matter what you do you will not avoid this problem, due to geometry.

\end{frame}


\begin{frame}\frametitle{The solution}


\ARROW We determine the change induced by the weight cut on the BALL sample (0.5\%, by counting the candidates on the unweighted simulation)\\
\ARROW We determine the change induced by the weight cut on the PHSP sample (0.2\%, by determining the sum of weights with and w/o including the large weights)\\
\ARROW  The larger number is conservatively assigned as systematic uncertainty\\


\end{frame}

\begin{frame}\frametitle{Lucky mistake}

\ARROW During this we noticed that the large weights have not been removed in the efficiency calculation but only in the plots.\\
\ARROW We therefore propose to leave them in, as we checked their effect is 0.2-0.5\%.

\end{frame}

\begin{frame}

\begin{center}
\begin{Huge}
Efficiency maps
\end{Huge}
\end{center}



\end{frame}



\begin{frame}\frametitle{Efficiency maps}

\begin{alertblock}{}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KeSS_Run1_total1}.pdf}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KmuSS_Run1_total1}.pdf}
\end{alertblock}


\end{frame}






\begin{frame}

\begin{table}[h]                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
     
        \begin{center}\begin{tabular}{lc}                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
                        \hline \hline                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
                        mass swap  & mass region vetoed \\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
                        \hline \hline                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
                        \multirow{2}{*}{$K$ with $\mu$ mass} & $3000<m_{K^-\mu^+}<3200$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
                        & $3630<m_{K^-\mu^+}<3740$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
                        \hline                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
                        \multirow{2}{*}{ $e$ with $\mu$ mass} & $2950<m_{e^-\mu^+}<3200$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
                        & $3630<m_{e^-\mu^+}<3740$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
                        \hline                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
                        \multirow{2}{*}{$K$ with $e$ mass}        & $3000<m_{K^+ e^-}<3200$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
                        & $3630<m_{K^+ e^-}<3740$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
                        \hline                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
                        \multirow{2}{*}{$\mu$ with $e$ mass} & $3000<m_{\mu^+ e^-}<3200$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
                        & $3630<m_{\mu^+ e^-}<3740$\\                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
                        \hline \hline                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
                \end{tabular}\end{center}                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
                \label{tab:charmonium_vetoes_signal}                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
        \end{table} 

\begin{exampleblock}{~}
The problem with this is that the mass hypothesis are not the same as in the Dalitz plane so the efficiency of this cuts is not  0.

\end{exampleblock}


\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Illustration}
\begin{columns}
\column{0.5\textwidth}
No veto

\column{0.5\textwidth}
Single veto

\end{columns}

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{images/FULL.pdf}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{images/ONECUT.pdf}
\end{frame}


\begin{frame}{Illustration}
\begin{columns}
\column{0.5\textwidth}
No veto

\column{0.5\textwidth}
All vetos

\end{columns}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{images/FULL.pdf}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{images/ALLCUT.pdf}\\


\ARROW The non-zero bins in the veto areas of the maps are not binning effects but genuine due to the mass hypothesis swap.
\ARROW The choice of the binning becomes an editorial one (next slide)

\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Proposed solution}

\ARROW To make the plots nicer we proposed to enlarge the bins:
\begin{alertblock}{Old plots:}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.35\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KeSS_Run1_total1}.pdf}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.35\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KmuSS_Run1_total1}.pdf}
\end{alertblock}


\begin{exampleblock}{New plots:}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.35\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KeSS_Run1_total}.pdf}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.35\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KmuSS_Run1_total}.pdf}
\end{exampleblock}

\end{frame}



\begin{frame}{Proposed solution}



\begin{exampleblock}{New plots:}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KeSS_Run1_total}.pdf}
\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.49\textwidth]{{images/dalitz_KmuSS_Run1_total}.pdf}
\end{exampleblock}

\ARROW Since we have handful of events the coarse binning is ok.

\end{frame}


\backupbegin

\begin{frame}\frametitle{Backup}
\topline

\end{frame}
\begin{frame}{Illustration}

\includegraphics[angle=-90,width=0.9\textwidth]{images/projection.pdf}
\end{frame}

\backupend

\end{document}
